No, this is OK. -- The Word Was God

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:43:23 08/04/02 Sun
Author: DJ
Author Host/IP: 216.198.101.155
Subject: No, this is OK.
In reply to: Greg 's message, "For petesakes gerry" on 11:51:50 08/04/02 Sun

I don't think this is Gerry.

I'll respond.

First, Yes we love the farm. And Yes, Shawn picked it out. And NO, husband doesn't slap me around anymore, it happened once and I took action against it. And yes, we got counseling and we are both better people for it today. I have forgiven him and he has forgiven me. ;0)

And yes, I enjoy the internet, this is no secret. And yes, I considered myself homebound in caring for Shawn, and yes this gave me extra time which I have spent on the internet making friends and creating chaos at times. LOL

Yes, you may dig up archives. No this wouldn't bother me in the slightest.

And no, I don't recall Squeak saying anything of this nature. And no, we have not neglected our girls if this is what you've implied.

And No, Shawn has never stated that he felt "left out" of this family.

I discovered yesterday that he has stated that he is going to marry a women whose name is Cheryl Enright. She's two months my elder. She is a recluse who has a history of attempting this sort of thing before in another county. She has a police record, and had her children taken from her.

She's a christian.

I haven't lost my children. Shawn is almost 29 years old. He's no longer a child. Jack has never been married and to the best of my knowledge, does not have any children.

Shawn recieves about 500 dollars a month. Seven years ago, when I was designated payee for Shawn's social security allotment, I ask the question, "what do I use these monies for"? Of course you know the answers.........
I ask if his monies can help pay for his home and transportation and they said "yes". I ask if he could pay for a cell phone, and they said "yes". So I made sure we had dependable transportation, suitable housing and a cell phone to carry with us, in the event we had trouble on the road.

When Enright decided she'd like to take over as caretaker of Shawn, she has gone to whatever extremes within her knowledge to create havoc for my and my family. She made a compliant to SRS that I was abusing Shawns funds. Of course this is a total fabrication, but now I have to provide as much documentation as I can from the last six months that reflects where his monies have gone.

Shawn is completely oblivious to these allegations because he's being kept under lock and key at Enright's Section Eight apartment, where he's being prevented from going to his Saturday job, he's held for several years, being prevented from contacting his many friends, and prevented from talking to his grandmother who has asked to speak with him.

If they can keep him under locks for 30 days, he loses everything he has at present. He will then be vulnerable to become a Ward of the state and can be placed in an institution that offers 24 hour locked down supervised care. The independence he's enjoyed since he became disabled will be lost for the rest of his natural life.

Not to say that this will be in effect immediately; they'll give Shawn the opportunity to fault himself first. If he is given the freedom and opportunity, he may be successful in his attempt at suicide next time.

Enright is a special person. She's doing a great job for the system to see Shawn well on his way to institutionalized care. Shawn doesn't have the conceptual abilities to foresee this due to his brain injury.

Enright through abitious vindictiveness and an agenda backed by the system, has all her duckies in a row. I am losing my first son of 29 years. His life will become that of rolling around in the halls of an institution for the rest of his natural life. If he gets excited and loud, he'll be shot full of haldol because a judge will give permission to take this action against him.

My heart is so broken over my son, no words can express.

If I didn't have other children who needed me, I would take my own life.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: No, this is OK. -- Sue da babe, 14:29:43 08/04/02 Sun
Re: No, this is OK. -- Rev. Jack Howell, 15:14:06 08/04/02 Sun
- Thanks Jack -- DJ, 21:25:23 08/04/02 Sun
  - Re: Thanks Jack -- Rev. Jack Howell, 04:27:23 08/05/02 Mon
    - This is what I mean DJ -- Greg, 06:43:53 08/05/02 Mon
      - I see what you're saying now -- DJ, 09:30:37 08/05/02 Mon
        It's all over now -- Mondo, 12:39:04 08/05/02 Mon
        It is -- Greg, 15:03:05 08/05/02 Mon
I know its Gerry -- Greg, 23:05:44 08/04/02 Sun
Re: No, this is OK. -- raine, 16:34:51 08/05/02 Mon