[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23/12/05 7:57pm
Author: Twoddly Bobshonks
Subject: Re: Annoucement re Form 74m
In reply to:
Snetchum Greezle
's message,
"Annoucement re Form 74m" on
23/12/05 7:53pm
>
>From: Goverment Department of Group Think
>
>Form 74m is being retired. There was much complaining
>about the following aspects with this form.
You say here that 74m is being retired, and yet you have invented 92g which depends on 74m - why?
Twoddly
>
>1. It was gender based - 74m was for females and 74f
>was for males.
>2. 74m was printed in 3 point type to get it all onto
>one A4 sheet - a requirement from the Form Size
>committee who met before the content of the form was
>decided.
>3. 74m's only purpose was to gain access to 842t -
>"Application to undertake an application for planning
>permit 731hw"
>
>The Group Think Dept. has recognised these issues and
>come up with 92g - "Process and Form to ease
>submission of 74m and 74g". We think having the same
>process for 74m and 74g is revolutionary and saves
>three forms and confusion. Some notes about 92g -
>1. There are three versions
> 92g35-65 for 18-35 year olds
> 92g12-34 for 36-54 year olds
> 92g23-47 for 55+ year olds
> Please select the form appropriate to your age
>group.
> This classification was forced on us by the
>requirements of 923rt, and the Form Naming committee
>met before requirements had been decided, and, all in
>all, they did a pretty good job.
>2. 74m and 74f are only available in English, so 92g
>is printed in 72 different languages.
>3. 92g is printed in clear 12 point type, which along
>with 2. means that the form is now 631 pages in length.
>4. To cope with the volume and size in 3, 92g is now
>hardcover bound and to help defray costs we must
>charge $84 for this form.
>5. After printing 10,000,000 copies of this form a
>small printing error was discovered, but to save costs
>a single page addendum has been added to the front of
>the form to notify of the change required. The
>addendum reads as follows "Whereever you see a
>misplaced 'a' replace it with an 'e'". Unfortunately
>a last minute search and replace operation went awry
>when preparing the form.
>6. The electronic version of the form is being entered
>into our computer system. Unfortunately a number of
>IT staff have had to be moved to wharehousing to cope
>with the storage requirements of this form. The
>repositioning of these staff will delay electronic
>implementation of this form by seven years and two
>months. When the electronic edition is in place
>however, the paper edition will no longer be required.
>
>The Group Think Dept. thanks you for reading this
>notice. If there is any way in which we can help you,
>please don't be afraid to ask.
>
>Snetchum Greezle
>Head Forms Management & Waste Reduction
>Group Think Department
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:[> [>
Re: Annoucement re Form 74m -- Snetchum Greezle,
23/12/05 8:06pm
>>
>>From: Goverment Department of Group Think
>>
>>Form 74m is being retired. There was much complaining
>>about the following aspects with this form.
>
>You say here that 74m is being retired, and yet you
>have invented 92g which depends on 74m - why?
>
>Twoddly
Good point, however, my brief was to solve the existing three problems with 74m, which is what I have done. There was no requirement to incorporate 74m's retirement into my solution.
74m, is being retired, and I believe I will receive that memo on my desk next week. Prior to 92g, we would have phased out 74m over a one year period, but now that 92g is dependent upon it, 92g will have to be phased out first.
Here is the unofficial timeline for 92g's phase out -
2006-2016 Consume 10,000,000 copies of 92g - 10 years
2013 Start planning phase out of electronic edition of 92g
2015 Move wharehouse staff back to IT in preperation for retirement of hardcopy 92g
2016 New IT staff, develop software to phase out 92g
2018 92g phase out software complete
2020 92g electronic edition phase out starts
2022 92g electronic edition phase out ends
So 22 years from start to finish, a great leap in efficiency from previous phase outs, I think you'll agree.
regs
Snetchum Greezle
>
>>
>>1. It was gender based - 74m was for females and 74f
>>was for males.
>>2. 74m was printed in 3 point type to get it all onto
>>one A4 sheet - a requirement from the Form Size
>>committee who met before the content of the form was
>>decided.
>>3. 74m's only purpose was to gain access to 842t -
>>"Application to undertake an application for planning
>>permit 731hw"
>>
>>The Group Think Dept. has recognised these issues and
>>come up with 92g - "Process and Form to ease
>>submission of 74m and 74g". We think having the same
>>process for 74m and 74g is revolutionary and saves
>>three forms and confusion. Some notes about 92g -
>>1. There are three versions
>> 92g35-65 for 18-35 year olds
>> 92g12-34 for 36-54 year olds
>> 92g23-47 for 55+ year olds
>> Please select the form appropriate to your age
>>group.
>> This classification was forced on us by the
>>requirements of 923rt, and the Form Naming committee
>>met before requirements had been decided, and, all in
>>all, they did a pretty good job.
>>2. 74m and 74f are only available in English, so 92g
>>is printed in 72 different languages.
>>3. 92g is printed in clear 12 point type, which along
>>with 2. means that the form is now 631 pages in
>length.
>>4. To cope with the volume and size in 3, 92g is now
>>hardcover bound and to help defray costs we must
>>charge $84 for this form.
>>5. After printing 10,000,000 copies of this form a
>>small printing error was discovered, but to save costs
>>a single page addendum has been added to the front of
>>the form to notify of the change required. The
>>addendum reads as follows "Whereever you see a
>>misplaced 'a' replace it with an 'e'". Unfortunately
>>a last minute search and replace operation went awry
>>when preparing the form.
>>6. The electronic version of the form is being entered
>>into our computer system. Unfortunately a number of
>>IT staff have had to be moved to wharehousing to cope
>>with the storage requirements of this form. The
>>repositioning of these staff will delay electronic
>>implementation of this form by seven years and two
>>months. When the electronic edition is in place
>>however, the paper edition will no longer be required.
>>
>>The Group Think Dept. thanks you for reading this
>>notice. If there is any way in which we can help you,
>>please don't be afraid to ask.
>>
>>Snetchum Greezle
>>Head Forms Management & Waste Reduction
>>Group Think Department
[ Edit | View ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Feedback: 