VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:57:37 11/16/01 Fri
Author: Kaz
Author Host/IP: 66.122.133.193
Subject: Re: Followup question (flood damage?)
In reply to: Rod 's message, "Followup question (flood damage?)" on 17:39:46 11/16/01 Fri

It wouldn't be in your best interest to fool with any car that suffered flood damage, much less a 928. I can't imagine that this car won't have all kinds of gremlins. Any kind of discount you got would probably be immidiately erased in repair issues anyway.

K

>Hi again,
>
>I did a CarFax check on this GTS. It shows it as a
>1994 model, so that appears to be clear enough.
>However, the CarFax check also threw up the following
>(everything else was okay):
>
>Problem Titles Checked: Results:
>Salvage/Junk Checked -
>Salvage/Junk Title Found
>Rebuilt/Reconstructed Checked - No
>Rebuilt/Reconstructed Title Found
>Flood Damage Checked - Flood
>Damage Title Found
>Damage Disclosure Checked - No Damage
>Disclosure Found
>Manufacturer Buyback (LEMON) Checked - No
>Manufacturer Buyback Found
>Exceeds Mechanical Limits (EML) Checked - No EML
>Found
>Not Actual Mileage (NAM) Checked - No NAM
>Found
>
>Everything else checked out okay.
>
>Now the question is: should I steer clear of this GTS
>or could it be okay? It had been registered in Texas,
>had apparently been flood damaged and couldn't be
>registered in Texas again. Given that I know this
>information, I could potentially get a decent deal on
>this car, but is it going to be more trouble than it's
>worth? What problems could this car have? Or could
>it be perfectly fine? Any suggestions?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Rod

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.