Re: The Wells report was Bullshit! -- Margaritaville NFL Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:43:12 08/20/15 Thu
Author: Niner
Author Host/IP: 71.135.162.147
Subject: Re: The Wells report was Bullshit!
In reply to: C-Hawk Watcher 's message, "4 games IS justice" on 10:19:16 08/20/15 Thu

>and according to legal analysts that ESPN talked to
>(talking about it this morning), it seems like this is
>a case of a judge basically prodding the league to
>settle (actually prodding both).
>
>The only way a judge can overturn the suspension is IF
>the union shows that the process was unfair....because
>the punishment and who doles it out is written into
>the CBA and and judge won't overturn a negotiated
>contract.
>
>Saying that the judge thinks it's harsh isn't the same
>as seeing the process as being unfair.

Was he really impartial? Does "I think he was generally aware" rise to the same standard of failing a drug test? This is what a judge looks at.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Wells report showed that Brady KNEW about it -- C-Hawk Watcher, 10:05:15 08/21/15 Fri
- Re: Not even close -- Niner, 19:31:21 08/21/15 Fri
  - You're way off -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:06:15 08/24/15 Mon
    - Re: You need to look at this legally not emotionally -- Niner, 00:18:39 08/25/15 Tue
      - I am using logic and science..you should try it -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:39:04 08/26/15 Wed
        Re: You have to undstand science first -- Niner, 10:37:43 09/03/15 Thu
        Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:44:51 09/03/15 Thu
        Re: Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- Niner, 13:15:01 09/03/15 Thu
        I disagre with judge, Sex. harrassment DOES NOT equal intergrity of game -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:36:07 09/04/15 Fri