Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject: Re: AFR court date 18th--analysis. Author: Steve Bonkers. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 06:58:54 01/30/02 Wed In reply to: Steve Bonkers. 's message, "Re: AFR court date has now changed to 18/2/2002" on 06:24:16 01/30/02 Wed Bush Lawyer Analysis. 1) The offer is due to expire on the 15th of Feb 2002, NSW Government have stated that it is not their decision, to renew contract but Erg's a spokesman for ERG declined to comment. Analysis---there are seven principles to a legally binding contract, if ERG choose to renegotiate it then they would possibly do so at more favourable terms to cover the added costs due to the delay. Unsure of the exact details of contract, I do not think the N.S.W. Government could renege as it would then lay its self open to possible further litigation, at any rate it is not Ergs fault that the contract is delayed. It was stated sometime ago in the press (this is from memory) that Cubic did not want all of the contract, they stated they were happy with a 50/50 arrangement, Erg replied that it was incapable of altering it's software. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) The solicitors for ERG said they were "ready and raring" to go, Cubic have stated they haven't "read all the facts" yet, The solicitors for ERG have replied, there is less to read than what you have stated there is. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) The judge, has now set the next hearing down for the 18/2/2002. Which is a Monday. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]