| Subject: correct naman si ivan |
Author:
shanikwa
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 00:50:32 03/02/04 Tue
Author Host/IP: dialup-67.25.248.156.Dial1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net/67.25.248.156
In reply to:
info
's message, "voice classification" on 01:09:47 02/01/04 Sun
nakakaloka naman ang mga reaction at replies sa message na 'to. talagang major seriousness.
pero if i may add my 2 cents. tama nga naman si ivan. medyo offensive nga lang sya minsan magpaliwanag, kaya may mga negative reactions tuloy. agree ako na tama nga ang mga definition ng posts sa different voice categories, pero mali naman ang application nya. those voices are for classical/opera singers. di applicable 'yon sa pop. if you're asking for classifications of a pop singer's voice, that would probably be, balladeers, belters, crooner (tama ba spelling?), r&b, soul, jazz, country, or even broadway kind of singing. kasi ang pop voice mahirap e-classify 'yan, kasi maraming mga improvisations and diversifications na ginagawa ng mga pop singers. Example, a lot of people think that Sarah Brightman is an opera singer. mali po 'yon. porke mataas ang boses nya, opera singer na sya? she has a sweet soprano voice, pero ang vocal attact nya is not that of an opera singer. si lani misalucha. she is a pop singer, but she incorporates some operatic style in her singing, but that does not make her a classical singer. mariah also adds a little spinto/coloratura touch to her songs sa mga adlibs nya, probably influenced by her mom, who is the real opera singer. but mariah is definitely pop. kung baga, don't compare modern dancers, folk dancers, hip hop dancers, jazz dancers, ballroom dancers to ballerinas.
Balik sa kay regine. regine has a true belter voice. and if i may add, one of the best belters i've ever heard in the whole world for that matter.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 