Re: Advantage -- NZCPA Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

Subject:

Re: Advantage

Author:
Becks

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:01:07 04/18/02 Thu
In reply to: Juno 's message, "Re: Advantage" on 12:57:23 04/18/02 Thu

Thanks for your reply: answers to follow:

>When refereeing I play advantage when the infringed
>player maintains resonable possession and is then able
>to take their next option without losing possession
>due to the foul occuring.
Is this true advantage though? what constitutes reasonable possession, what if the next option happens, but possesion is lost at this point? Is this true advantage when if the restart was taken, the player receiving the option from the fouled player may not have lost possesion.

An example of this is when
>player A is paddle fouled by B but maintains
>possession advantage would be called and the player is
>able to take a shot and score no advantage was lost,
>but if A was fouled and fumbled the ball because of
>the paddle foul I would call the play back and award a
>free shot.

I would hope every ref would do this. BUT what happens if the fouled player then passes off? If you don't call the foul, is this really advantage? After all, perhaps the player may have taken the shot if they had not been fouled? But was put off after being fouled...has advantage really occured?

Additionally, would you award a goal penalty for a deliberate foul on a player clearly int he act of shooting?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
B-) Re: Advantage	vish	19:11:41 04/18/02 Thu
Damned picture didn't work!!! (NT) -- vish, 19:13:56 04/18/02 Thu Ah.. gotta use the dropdown menu... (NT) -- vish, 09:07:55 04/19/02 Fri
Re: Advantage	Juno	09:25:45 04/19/02 Fri