Re: The Clash and Hall and Oates -- American Top 40: The Countdown of the Century

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:17:20 04/24/02 Wed
Author: Lisa Curry
Subject: Re: The Clash and Hall and Oates
In reply to: Darren 's message, "The Clash and Hall and Oates" on 09:31:46 04/24/02 Wed

>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>This discussion has led me to another question in my
>>>mind. The time frame is coming quickly in which
>>>artists who premered from that time will be up for
>>>induction into the hall of fame! And as much as I
>>>love 1980, 1981, and 1982, I seriously dobut that
>many
>>>of the artists who were prevelent during that time
>>>have any shot at ever making it to Cleveland.
>
>They are a no brainer because on artistic merit alone.
> "London Calling" is considered one of the best albums
>ever, and I believe was named top album of the 1980's
>by Rolling Stone. If the Talking Heads made this
>year, you can be sure that the Clash will no doubt be
>in.
>
>Another one that I forgot is Hall and Oates. To me,
>they should be in there. They were a dominant force
>in pop music from 1976 to 1990, including six number
>one hits, and 16 top tens, and twenty-nine top 40's.
>However, they're seems to be a backlash against them.
>I saw a recent review of their greatest hits album and
>it was given three stars. Not horrible, but certainly
>the reviewer was not impressed with them. It seems
>that there music is not standing the test of time
>
>It seems that groups from that time that were popular
>have been pigeonholed as artisically lacking. REO,
>Styx, Journey have all been crucified by critics. I
>feel that Hall and Oates not only dominated the pop
>charts, they also transcended the R&B charts in a way
>that few white groups have been able to do. I really
>hope that they make it in, though it seems that they
>should have had their first year of eligibility last
>year.
>>>
>>>Here is the ones that I can think of:
>>>
>>>>
>>>2)The Clash: Another no brainer.
>>>
>>
>>How is The Clash a no brainer? Seems to me they only
>>had one big hit. Not exactly a household name like
>>the others you mentioned.
The Clash had only two top 40 hits: "Train In Vain (Stand By Me)" from 1980, and "Rock The Casbah" (their only Top 10 hit) from 1983. By the way, the Bee Gees were inducted into the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame back in 1997. Also, this message is for Jeffster. Are you the same Jeffster that posts on the American Country Countdown message board?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]