Re: goHChockey = Loser fraud -- CROSSPORTS: Holy Cross Crusaders Sports Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, May 10, 10:28:47pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:10:14 07/14/04 Wed
Author: goHChockey
Subject: Re: goHChockey = Loser fraud
In reply to: HC 1991 's message, "goHChockey = Loser fraud" on 23:12:29 07/13/04 Tue

To HC 1991:

Excuse me if I didn't recall the President for all four years of my tenure. I could have looked it up online if I really was a fraud. BTW, I answered 3 of 5 of your silly questions, the exceptions being some theater I never attended and some professor I never had. I was a History major, but never once took a course from Lap Dog (know who that was?), like all the football players.

You were thankfully still in HS during my years on the hill, so you likely wouldn't know how well attended hockey games were in the mid-'80s. We most certainly did regularly outdraw the women BB and the men BB for a couple of games as well.

Again, because you weren't there, you wouldn't know that football and BB got training table and hockey did not.
You're response might be that they somehow deserved it and we did not. Well let me hazard a guess and tell you that I've likely played with (HC hockey) and against more hockey players who went on to play professionally than the HC football and BB teams produced during my years. That is some indication perhaps that this was quality hockey, even if the administration didn't recognize it.

Again, I relayed information that was provided to me from a friend at HC with personal knowledge of the HC bid for the ECAC. Neither I nor my source have concrete knowledge what the ECAC's decision will ultimately be. It was merely the impression of the source that our bid MAY have failed. And again, I fully support our admission to the ECAC. And again, not one of the other applicants can compete with HC in any meaningful way. Why would a Quinnipiac supporter say such things? Moreover, I don't see any other posters revealing who their sources are in this regard. I'm just sharing info that was given to me, which info I believe other alums and fans might want to hear, even if it is bad news. In any event, our posts don't influence a thing, so try decaf next time. Try growing up too.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Re: goHChockey = Loser fraud -- HC 1991, 01:16:28 07/14/04 Wed

Lap Dog = Fr. Lapomarda, S.J.

and from what i was told, he was not as easy as the name would indicate, despite the abundance of fball players in his classes.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: goHChockey = Loser fraud -- goHChockey, 01:20:43 07/14/04 Wed

More convinced now? Why don't I ask you some trivia, hockey trivia! What was the Teapot Tournament, where was it held, who was in it, and when was it last played?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: goHChockey = Loser fraud -- HC 1991, 02:27:35 07/14/04 Wed

started in 1980. probably killed before or around 1986, b/c I don't remember it in my 4 years.

teams were mostly D II teams situated in Mass, which HC was at the time. an alternative to the beanpot, but still played at the boston garden.

teams included umass lowell and merrimack - prior to the hockey east and d1 upgrades. HC and maybe salem state too. bowdoin or colby may have been in the mix at one time too.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]