VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]
Subject: Re: Max continuous at altitude


Author:
David Durocher
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:39:27 01/06/02 Sun
In reply to: Nicolas Bacon 's message, "Max continuous at altitude" on 00:06:57 01/06/02 Sun

I'm glad you brought it up, Nick. And I would buy it. Probably because it's the only intelligible one I've heard. I asked many guys from mtc, Stephen M. asked some ingeneers at Bombardier and nobody could give any reason. I even asked a supervisor what he could think of.... and he replied; and I quote: "Qu'est-ce tu connais dans les jets, toi?".

From that day, I stoped bothering myself with this stuff. But thanks Nick, I'll take this one.

Cheers

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.