VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]2 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:51:18 04/18/02 Thu
Author: Oliver
Author Host/IP: ACB93FE0.ipt.aol.com / 172.185.63.224
Subject: Re: Digital Output in HM-DR10000?????
In reply to: Oriol 's message, "Re: Digital Output in HM-DR10000?????" on 19:10:56 04/17/02 Wed

Hi Oriol,

>When I bought the VCR, in the datasheet I saw '1x
>DV(in) + 1x MPEG2 (in/out)' connectors. So in theory
>it was capable to input or output MPEG2 streams, apart
>from input DV (not output DV).

Obviously the sheet of the Japanese version.


>The salesman told me it
>was true (there is no datasheet of 10000EU). When i

Of course there is. =:-o

And: Never trust a salesman. =;->


>>>D-VHS is not for editing videos - DV is.
>>>Because of the film & tv industry.
>I'm very dissapointed that a DIGITAL video can't be
>used for video editing with a PC.

So am I. Thanks to the film industry, who are blocking it (and the US government with it's stupid DCMA).


>For me is very
>important to have backup copies. (I understand that I
>can't copy commercial tapes such as movies).

Although this is absolutly legal (for private purposes).


>Yes, for me it is the wrong device. For me is more
>useful my 2 S-VHS videos, that allow me to edit and
>COPY my own videos.

But: Even without digital interface, the quality of D-VHS is superior to the best S-VHS.

Anyway: The Panasonic D-VHS with MPEG-in/out was taken out of the market, because of the pressure of the film industry. The newer machines have MPEG-in/out again, because these interfaces have better copy protection than the older ones.


>Digital 5.1??? Newest D-VHS perhaps, mine doesn't.

No, even the oldest can record 5.1. And yes, your one can't!
No digital recorder, D-VHS/DVD/HD/..., can record 5.1 from analog sources. They can record 5.1, if it is embedded in a DVB stream (from tv). But for doing that, the recorder has to have a MPEG-in. The oldest D-VHS recorders are just a sort of "backup storage" for digital tv. Very cheap, because they don't need an expensive (at that time *very* expensive) MPEG encoder. Of course they can't record from analog resources (they do it in VHS).

The HM-DR10000 type recorder was a new generation: Combining losless records from digital tv (MPEG-in) with the capability of encoding analog tv (built in encoder). Then the problems with the film industry came up - the US and EU versions became crippled.

In addition: Digital tv is widely common in US an Japan, but not so often used in Europe (and in Germany, it was strictly *forbidden* to use such a type MPEG-in recorder - not because of the recordings, it was just one type of receiver allowed to be used in the German tv cable net =:-o).


>So
>DVHS standard changes in time, and force users to buy
>new devices??!! Arrrggggg that is shameful.

That's evolution. Fast, but evolution. A little bit comparable to VHS mono to VHS hifi or VHS to S-VHS or SP to LP to EP or S-VHS to S-VHS ET ...

... OK, keeping the film industry in mind, it's not exactly what Darwin was about. >;-(

But a recorder like the new (NTSC only) HM-DH30000 was not possible at the time of the first D-VHS recorders - or not affordable. And Data-VHS is more flexible than VHS. Even the newest recorders do not match every possiblity defined in the D-VHS standard.

I think: "If I need it, I buy it". If I would think: "Tomorrow it will be less expensive and/or has more functions, so I'll buy it tomorrow", than I would never buy anything with a processor. Probably I would have benn stucked with my first computer, an 8 bit Atari XL, until the end of my days ... ;-)


Regards, Oliver

German D-VHS FAQ: http://D-VHS.vampirehost.de

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.