Re: No bearing on the question -- Adilbrand Noblesword's Hall of Warriors

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:03:18 10/21/02 Mon
Author: Abba's Son
Subject: Re: No bearing on the question
In reply to: Adilbrand 's message, "No bearing on the question" on 13:58:11 10/20/02 Sun

How many of these prepared discourses do you keep on file? I know I have seen this one before. I am actually open to the idea of Revelation being a 1st century message to a 1st century people. However, I believe that the Bible reads us as much as we read it. God's Word does not have to enter our context to be relevant; often, we find ourselves entering its context. For example, I currently find myself in a time of Wilderness Wandering, crying out for the fire of God to direct my path. I think that this forum is in the context of the Tower of Babel. Current pholosophy has so diluted itself that no one understands anyone. In fact, the original Hebrew says in the Gen. 11 story that they 'no longer listened' to one another. Interesting!

BUT! My answer to MVD's question did have bearing. He asked how I would react. I would say it is the Mark of the Beast. (By the way, I don't plan on being here when it comes to that point. The only choice you will have when this is offered is "Would you like your loyalty Mark on your hand or forehead?" My advise to you would be choose neither!)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I could respond, but really, what would be the point? (NT) -- mvd, 15:38:42 10/21/02 Mon
- Re: I could respond, but really, what would be the point? -- Abba's Son, 14:39:17 10/22/02 Tue
  - Personally... -- Mt. Healthy Mountaineer, 16:52:42 10/22/02 Tue
    - Yes, but why must it have a Christian context? -- mvd, 11:34:10 10/23/02 Wed
      - Re: Yes, but why must it have a Christian context? -- mt. healthy mountaineer, 16:41:26 10/23/02 Wed
        Okay. (NT) -- mvd, 11:10:03 10/24/02 Thu
  - My balls are far from busted -- mvd, 11:31:06 10/23/02 Wed