VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:16:46 06/27/00 Tue
Author: Remington
Subject: Re: 'up and under swing' - back & down
In reply to: Peter 's message, "Re: 'up and under swing' - back & down" on 12:09:31 06/27/00 Tue

OK. This is where things get tricky, and confusing, to me. If he has an underhanded hit, and I think he does, then, some of the other stuff gets contradictory.

Moe does hold the angles, and the 1995 Golf Digest article said that for him to keep his head that far back behind the ball that something has to give, or, he will spin out. Peter seems to have defined that by not swinging, and moving the legs forward, tilting back and letting evrying come forward.

Can you underhand that club in there, with this type of move. Further, if you watch Moe, with the driver (actually all the clubs) the shoulders do trade places. How does all that factor in. The shoulders open after impact, but that seems to be a continual plane, with impact a temporary moment.

If you do it the way Peter says, you don't have a pusher move...I don't think.

The logic of this swing completely evades me. If you hold the position, just past impact, and, then, swing it back (reverse the motion), it would appear to be a classic pusher swing.

Is the pusher move causing the tilt back? Or, is it Peter's move?

Remington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.