VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: Re: Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," now that I've seen it


Author:
Kathyrn
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03:08:45 03/16/04 Tue
In reply to: Xpltivdletd 's message, "Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," now that I've seen it" on 20:53:43 02/28/04 Sat

>My Other Half and I took in Mel Gibson’s movie “The
>Passion of the Christ”
on Saturday 28 February
>2004, in direct and intentional disobedience of the
>Religious Left.
>
>I will not pretend to predict what it will show you,
>if you choose to see it. It shows the viewer what Mel
>Gibson and others put their hearts into showing us—and
>it shows each person things that one brings into the
>theater. So, no one else can ‘understand’ this movie
>for another.
>
>I will tell you the alleged “anti-Semitism” issue is a
>bull-shipment. Gibson went IMHO to the absolute
>limits of his conscience NOT to make his movie about
>that.
>
>Our “unbiased©,” “Mainstream®” Media have
>wallowed in their selective indignation over Gibson’s
>depiction of the violence, but their protests lack the
>ring of truth. It was not a children’s-book period of
>Human history for Jew, Roman, or follower of some
>mysterious Holy-man the formers’ “Vichy” leadership
>feared might de-stabilize things. “Cruel-&-unusual
>punishments,” circa First Century A.D., was an
>oxymoron, as it had ever been, and Gibson portrayed it
>honestly, based on painstaking research—nothing more.
>BUT, one might wish to see it first without one’s
>small children.
>
>The movie transported me. It reached in and pulled at
>things. It showed me things-expected—and unexpected.
>At least one of its languages seemed to expect a reply
>at times, which defies rational explanation but there
>it was.
>
>The movie will almost certainly show each viewer
>something different but as intense. I would choose to
>see it again, even without political entities I
>detest—instructing us that we shouldn’t. I cannot
>imagine wishing I hadn’t seen it, regardless of my
>beliefs—or presuming to tell anyone else why not to
>see it.
>
>RKBA! Regards, all.
------------

Hey thanks for your review...

I have not seen it yet.

Though I have seen lots of clips of it. And found it interesting that he shot the movie with the actors speaking aramaic or Latin with subtitles..

That he had the actor that played christ speak the language that christ actually spoke is a plus.

Like so many movies, I will more than likely wait till it comes out on dvd.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," now that I've seen itXpltivdletd12:02:02 03/16/04 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.