Re: Life-denying literalism? -- The Blind Leading the Blind Discussion Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:30:39 04/07/01 Sat
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: Life-denying literalism?
In reply to: cezoram 's message, "Life-denying literalism?" on 10:12:19 04/05/01 Thu

>
>I have heard Grant in the past say that he does not
>take the scriptures literally. He says that we should
>not. Why? Because such literalism of ancient text
>are life-denying. Life-denying???
>
>Reading the scriptures literally gives me hope, not
>denies life. If I read the scriptures as just
>fictional stories, I cannot relate to them. How can
>you relate to something that did not happen?
>
>When reading the scriptures, I see a history of people
>who experienced God. I see people that received
>revelations from God, so that they could better
>understand the deity that they worshipped. I see
>people that were involved in various wars and battle
>so that they could maintain their freedom. I see
>people that are just like people today. Humans have
>not changed over time. Humans are the same today, as
>they were in times past, despite what techonology
>these humans have. We are told that we can learn from
>history. But how can we learn from the history in the
>Book of Mormon or Bible, if we cannot and must not
>view those books as literal history? How can we learn
>if we view those books as fiction rather than fact?
>
>It is clear that Grant will not learn from history,
>because he does not believe that the scriptures are
>authentic histories.
>
>And if Grant and company fail to learn, they will
>eventually fail also, just as the people found in the
>scriptures.
>
>Cezoram
>

Life-denying. What a strange term. What does it mean exactly? I bet Grant couldn't answer that question. Maybe "life-denying" simply means "I don't like it".

Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]