VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:13:18 08/02/03 Sat
Author: Joe, Portland
Author Host/IP: 216.210.144.6
Subject: Re: Ian Howfield report, week 2 2002
In reply to: Ian Verhaegen (Utah) 's message, "Ian Howfield report, week 2 2002" on 06:22:25 08/01/03 Fri

We feel your pain. Prowlers run a pass-first offense. So what happens in Week 2? We open the game with about six-straight running plays! HUH??? Foibles of the game.
>Week 2 of the 2003 FIFL season is over and, I must
>say, was quite disappointing. The Utah Rattlers lost
>a squeaker to the Dayton Wussbags.
>
>The fault of this loss, obviously, is placed square on
>the coaching staff. I did my part. I made the only
>field goal I was given the opportunity to kick. Can
>you believe that with 12 seconds left on the clock in
>the 2nd quarter, with the ball on Dayton's 42
>yardline, the coaches elected to PUNT! PUNT? What
>were they thinking? I've got the strongest leg in
>this league, I could have easily made the 59 yarder.
>Guess what...that would've been the difference in the
>game. Ok, one bad decision, we can forgive....but;
>in the fourth quarter, the decision was made to go for
>a 2 point conversion of Jerome's (Hurd) touchdown.
>Nevermind we had already gotten one earlier in the
>game running the same play (and they did run the same
>play.) It was doomed to fail. Had I been given the
>opportunity...'boom!' tie game, we go to overtime. I
>obviously would've gotten the game winning field goal
>and that would've been that.
>
>So, due to coaching ineptitude, Utah has to suffer an
>embarrasing home loss to the Wussbags. I'm disgusted,
>I'm done, bye.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • Re: Ian Howfield report, week 2 2002 -- Joe, Portland, 22:14:41 08/02/03 Sat

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.