Daniel Pearl wasn't from Fox News... -- Notes from Zarahemla Political Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:34:18 03/02/07 Fri
Author: Eppy
Subject: Daniel Pearl wasn't from Fox News...
In reply to: TastingTheBlood 's message, "No Subject" on 17:53:39 03/01/07 Thu

Quote:

"The corporations that hire these people are part of the root corruption."

If I remember right, he was from the Wall Street Journal or a similar publication and in addition, he actually did articles that didn't portray the terrorists as scum. So you are saying guilt by association??? What about the reporter for the Christian Science Monitor, a woman...luckily she was released. Are they part of the "root corruption?"

"They work for the enemy just as much as the US sevicemen do."

Ah...now you true colors are showing.

I refer you to what I refered Jay above to. Go get the video the church put out called "Be Not Ashamed" and watch it.

Again, we will never agree here. You see the whole reason we are fighting there as corrupt. I see it as a part of a bigger battle that I have already outlined and as I said to Jay, I can respect your opinion.

Al Sharpton, anyone?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Do you Just Hear what you Want to Hear??? -- TastingTheBlood, 08:26:47 03/02/07 Fri
- well, okay... -- Cricket, 08:39:33 03/02/07 Fri
- And You Don't Hear Only What YOU Want to Hear???? (NT) -- Eppy, 08:48:15 03/02/07 Fri
  - You mentioned above... -- Eppy, 08:58:32 03/02/07 Fri
    - One of the biggest ironies of that era -- Cricket, 13:17:47 03/02/07 Fri
- I am going to attempt to explain why I feel the way I do, for what it is worth... -- Eppy, 09:37:11 03/02/07 Fri
  - Okay, but let me ask you this . . . -- Jay, 09:44:49 03/02/07 Fri
    - Fair Question -- Eppy, 14:47:15 03/02/07 Fri
      - One question I like to ask my dad... -- TastingTheBlood, 15:45:06 03/02/07 Fri
        Theories perhaps.... -- Eppy, 17:23:33 03/02/07 Fri
        When we were over there -- Cricket, 19:49:44 03/02/07 Fri
        No terror attacks before 9-11? -- Cricket, 19:45:04 03/02/07 Fri
  - Saddam hid his weapons in Syria (NT) -- Cricket, 13:14:38 03/02/07 Fri
    - hm.......... -- TastingTheBlood, 09:02:22 03/03/07 Sat
      - No. They were in Syria. He moved them there -- Cricket, 11:24:20 03/03/07 Sat
      - Well, I heard Syria too. -- Eppy, 14:27:59 03/03/07 Sat
        Here is something that shows the Democrats will -- Cricket, 18:00:31 03/03/07 Sat
        If I Had One... -- TastingTheBlood, 19:48:08 03/03/07 Sat
        Well, tradtionally they sort of were... -- Eppy, 11:08:31 03/04/07 Sun
        The Democrats are the majority and they -- Cricket, 15:13:30 03/04/07 Sun
        I Did hear about this a few days ago -- Eppy, 11:02:57 03/04/07 Sun
        Hope has broken out in Baghdad again. -- Cricket, 15:17:46 03/04/07 Sun
        I Hadn't heard about the fast -- Eppy, 16:42:16 03/04/07 Sun
        Well, I only mention -- Cricket, 17:02:04 03/04/07 Sun