Re: impostors -- Hogalum Discussion

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: impostors

Author:
Ken

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:55:41 06/21/02 Fri
In reply to: Jeff 's message, "Re: impostors" on 08:30:01 06/21/02 Fri

>I don't
>want to see anyone assuming the disguise of another
>hogalum except Dave. I don't care if my pic is
>manipulated or placed all over the friggin' screen, to
>me thats a sign of endearment. Lets be MINDFUL please.
>If someone does something, using Curt as an example,
>don't respond back with tit for tat, stop and
>ask...'what is going on with you?' Is this
>intentional? I'm hurt, were you trying to hurt me or
>is it something else?

I think that's good advice Jefftortle, but I hope I am clear that Curt using and modifying my picture is not the issue. It was the words in his post that pissed me off.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: impostors
Author: Jeff [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 13:06:54 06/21/02 Fri >I think that's good advice Jefftortle, but I hope I am >clear that Curt using and modifying my picture is not >the issue. It was the words in his post that pissed >me off. Yes, Ken I understand. I was referring to John's statement/request. I understand its the words that has 'tickled your fancy'