| Subject: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra |
Author:
JOE
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 12:44:57 05/08/04 Sat
In reply to:
matt
's message, "Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra" on 17:15:44 10/05/03 Sun
>>>I think the SS is better than an SVT. The reason why
>>>is because an SS runs a 4.54 seconds to 60 and goes
>>>down 1/4 mile in 12.61 @ 109 mph!* But a SVT has a
>>>390hp engine and is still is about 500 pounds heavier
>>>than an SS with just 325hp too! An SVT runs 4.61 to
>60
>>>and covers 1/4 mile in 12.69 @ 114 mph!* The other
>>>thing is that the SVT took everything from the Camaro
>>>SS ( transmission, tires, design of traction control,
>>>suspension, and air induction design) and also they
>>>would have to stick a supercharger to make 390hp and
>>>390 ft.-lb. of torque in there too.
>>>*Based on all imformation.
>>
>>
>>Based on all information you're a dumbass. A 6spd 02
>>SS bonestock runs about 13.25@109 in the 1/4 and a 5.2
>>0-60(Motortrend and Automobile). A 03 Cobra runs the
>>1/4 in 12.43@114 and 0-60 in 4.6-4.7(MM&FF, 5.0,
>>Motortrend). You also need to use a different set of
>>scales as the Cobra isn't 500#'s heavier than the SS
>>it weighs 3665# while the SS is 3320#. As far as
>>stealing parts The T56 was originally designed for the
>>Viper so who stole what? The Cobras T56 is entirely
>>different than the Viper spec or the GM tranny in that
>>it uses an integral bellhousing. Suspension? WTF? The
>>SS uses a front SLA and solid rear while the Cobra
>>uses a front MacPherson strut and IRS. OK, air
>>induction, Ford was the first to succesfully use Mass
>>Air on the 5.0's and Gm later went that way as well.
>>Again SS uses a centrally located MAF and filter box
>>while the Cobra uses a side mounted MAF and inner
>>fender entry.
>>
>>Basically this tells me you don't know shit about
>>anything as you got every single thing you rambled on
>>about wrong. Good job Brain trust! ;)
>
>
>even though they put a supercharger on it its a 281ci
>motor and a camaro ss is 350ci. even without the
>supercharger it puts out nearly as much horsepower.
>.08 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile without the
>supercharger. not too bad.
>
>
>
>
Personaly id rather spend about $20,000 on a 2000 SS and and a few mods to it like "True ram intake", Loud Mouth Exhaust, Computer Mod, stonger Spark plugs and wires, Thermostate, hearders, bigger Mass air flow censor. then spending about $40 grand on a SvtCobra with a weak supercharger on it. i mean if ford whent back to a 5.0 then their 4.6 ill think about the SVT.. but theirs nothign like the power of a SS..and by the way my friends 2000 ss thats stock runs a 0-60 in 4.9 seconds not sure of the 1/4 mile yet....
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 