Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra -- Ford Mustang

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra

Author:
matt

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:15:44 10/05/03 Sun
In reply to: 1 Bad 88 GT 's message, "Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra" on 00:45:04 09/07/03 Sun

>>I think the SS is better than an SVT. The reason why
>>is because an SS runs a 4.54 seconds to 60 and goes
>>down 1/4 mile in 12.61 @ 109 mph!* But a SVT has a
>>390hp engine and is still is about 500 pounds heavier
>>than an SS with just 325hp too! An SVT runs 4.61 to 60
>>and covers 1/4 mile in 12.69 @ 114 mph!* The other
>>thing is that the SVT took everything from the Camaro
>>SS ( transmission, tires, design of traction control,
>>suspension, and air induction design) and also they
>>would have to stick a supercharger to make 390hp and
>>390 ft.-lb. of torque in there too.
>>*Based on all imformation.
>
>
>Based on all information you're a dumbass. A 6spd 02
>SS bonestock runs about 13.25@109 in the 1/4 and a 5.2
>0-60(Motortrend and Automobile). A 03 Cobra runs the
>1/4 in 12.43@114 and 0-60 in 4.6-4.7(MM&FF, 5.0,
>Motortrend). You also need to use a different set of
>scales as the Cobra isn't 500#'s heavier than the SS
>it weighs 3665# while the SS is 3320#. As far as
>stealing parts The T56 was originally designed for the
>Viper so who stole what? The Cobras T56 is entirely
>different than the Viper spec or the GM tranny in that
>it uses an integral bellhousing. Suspension? WTF? The
>SS uses a front SLA and solid rear while the Cobra
>uses a front MacPherson strut and IRS. OK, air
>induction, Ford was the first to succesfully use Mass
>Air on the 5.0's and Gm later went that way as well.
>Again SS uses a centrally located MAF and filter box
>while the Cobra uses a side mounted MAF and inner
>fender entry.
>
>Basically this tells me you don't know shit about
>anything as you got every single thing you rambled on
>about wrong. Good job Brain trust! ;)

even though they put a supercharger on it its a 281ci motor and a camaro ss is 350ci. even without the supercharger it puts out nearly as much horsepower. .08 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile without the supercharger. not too bad.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	Terry	18:51:56 11/16/03 Sun

Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	cole	12:01:32 11/25/03 Tue

Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	Matt	21:35:34 12/29/03 Mon
Camaro vs Mustang -- Larry De La Cruz, 11:52:02 02/06/04 Fri Re: Camaro vs Mustang -- MarcosFromMexicali, 12:35:17 02/08/04 Sun
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	SSman	15:56:37 12/31/03 Wed

Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	cha vant	00:20:15 01/04/04 Sun

Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra	JOE	12:44:57 05/08/04 Sat
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mustang SVT Cobra -- timmy, 19:30:31 10/14/04 Thu