VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]
Subject: Re: Meeting Proposal


Author:
Tim
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:57:43 05/29/03 Thu
In reply to: Stuart 's message, "Re: Meeting Proposal" on 17:45:29 05/29/03 Thu

Sorry, I thought it was quite clear at the meeting, and I don't remember you voicing your opinion at the meeting either.



>Waaaaaaaiiiiiiit a minute. As far as I was concerned,
>we were voting on the offbeat entries being 8 with a
>1m45 time limit. Bristol abstained on the grounds that
>we agreed with the qualifications but disagreed with
>the time limit.
>
>Now it seems that we simply voted on a reduction of
>the time limit. If this was the case then Bristol
>would have opposed the motion. If two of us thought
>that we were voting for the amendment described
>immediately above then it is quite possible others did.
>
>Stuart
>>>
>>>I'd happily watch 6 good off-beats for 4 minutes
>each,
>>>but with the number of entries this year I soon went
>>>to the bar for a few drinks instead (also fine with
>>>me.. :) ).
>>>
>>
>>Exactly - if you don't want to watch a routine, don't!
>>Just please don't limit those who do want to take
>part.
>>
>>And I have to agree with Olivia - there was no
>>discussion on this new time limit. It's a very
>>different kind of amendment than the qualifying team
>>one and should have been opened up for discussion
>>beforehand.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Meeting ProposalLise18:53:36 05/29/03 Thu
Re: Meeting ProposalDi18:55:29 05/29/03 Thu
Re: Meeting ProposalStuart19:30:59 05/29/03 Thu


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.