VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:28:29 01/30/03 Thu
Author: No name
Subject: ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING GIANT LAVA LAMP

The Giant Lava Lamp application failed to cut the muster. Identification of Funding Resource: WA-CERT; WA State funding. Both the applicant and the grantor agency should have the same interests, intentions, and needs if a proposal is to be considered an acceptable candidate for funding.
Once a potential grantor agency is identified, a grant application comes into play. The more agency personnel know about the proposal, the better the chance of support and of an eventual favorable decision.
NOTE: In the case of the giant lava lamp project proposed at Soap Lake, application was flawed; City of Soap Lake and Applicant did not have the same interests and intentions.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING GIANT LAVA LAMP -- KW, 05:57:44 01/30/03 Thu

For the initial giant lava lamp proposal development to be acceptable several bases should have been covered rather than bypassed. Seeking Criticism Is Very Important. At Some Point, seek out a neutral third party to review the proposal for continuity, clarity and reasoning. For example, has the writer made unsupported assumptions or used jargon or excessive language in the proposal? Applications Require A
Signature. Most proposals are made to institutions rather than individuals. Signatures of Chief Administrative officials are required and included in the proposal where appropriate. THE GIANT LAVA LAMP APPLICATION WAS NOT SIGNED BY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS OF CITY OF SOAP LAKE. IT WAS NOT THE INTENTION OR INTEREST OF CITY TO DO SO EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICATION WAS MADE OUT IN NAME OF CITY OF SOAP LAKE.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.