Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- macOne, 06:45:19 02/23/03 Sun

Was their authorization to use city and county officials names on the giant lava lamp poster? Hard to believe.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- anderson, 06:49:06 02/23/03 Sun

Come on, these guys are only looking for clout. Conflict of interest is not their concern.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- hankthefrank, 06:59:58 02/23/03 Sun

If the local chamber of commerce along with county and city officials willing became listed as lava poster boys and girls, those weighty sponsors maybe also willing to pay for a royalty dispute if it is brought about. Bowing to the KING OF LAVA is always considered a proper gesture.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- Moses Lake, 14:08:13 02/23/03 Sun

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see why the giant lava lamp posters are alluding to people of title, Kenneth Lee, Fred Slough, Terry Brewer, Bill Riley and Tim Snead to name a few. Name dropping won't elevate the giant lava lamp cause. We do read past see Jane run. Snow jobs will always be snow jobs. Bad taste will always be bad taste.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- DR. LALA, 14:28:08 02/23/03 Sun

I remain UNIMPRESSED.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: QUESTION IS: WHO MAY BE DEMANDING ROYALTIES RE GIANT LAVA LAMP? -- wade, 09:14:27 02/26/03 Wed

The commissioner named on Brent's poster, does wear more than one hat, appoints committee that selects by priority projects in Grant County to be funded. Matter of ethics: Adding that name leads us to BLack's legal definition of the "doctrine of fairness." This perilously borders on a prejudicial issue, especially when name has been used without person's knowledge or permission and posters have been advertised and sold. Could be that nothing is scared when your hell-bent to shove your dream up everyone's derriere; whether the silent majority of the population in the community wants it or not hasn't seemed to matter much.

[ Edit | View ]