Crooked nail -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, February 17 2003, 7:27:29
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Crooked nail
In reply to: Todd 's message, "Family reunion, you know!" on Mon, February 17 2003, 4:14:57

>Come on, Peter! That is the crooked nail I told you about!

And based on one crooked nail you don't believe in the cross, with a million perfect straight nails hammered into it. You must be a descendant of Thomas, the non-believer, who first had to lay his fingers in the hole of the hands of Jesus before he was convinced.

I'm 100% sure we will find an explanation for this one crooked nail too. Praise the Lord!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Crooked nail -- Todd, Mon, February 17 2003, 10:20:17
Some more crooked nails -- Todd, Tue, February 18 2003, 9:41:28
- Inaccuracy, but.... -- Margaret, Tue, February 18 2003, 15:25:14
  - Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 3:39:04
    - Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 8:15:56
      - It were the same journalists of the same newspaper! -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:09:30
        OK, they are -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 17:57:21
        Believe or not believe, that is the question -- Katerina, Thu, February 20 2003, 3:23:06
        Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Todd, Thu, February 20 2003, 6:31:40
        Re: Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, February 20 2003, 16:45:13
        You taught me to be a bore, Peter! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 4:25:44
        Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:02:14
        Re: Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:57:22
        No special questions -- Margaret, Fri, February 21 2003, 14:41:19
        Three versions -- Todd, Sat, February 22 2003, 7:32:21
        The first or the second ones -- Margaret, Sun, February 23 2003, 13:39:14
        A dictionary for reading between the lines -- Margaret, Thu, February 20 2003, 21:41:48
      - Did not you read the original of the first article? -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:50:08
    - Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Margaret, Wed, February 19 2003, 14:30:05