>
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:20:02 17/05/01 Thu
Author: 囉仔
Subject: Re: 回應
In reply to: TED 's message, "Re: 回應" on 16:41:03 09/05/01 Wed

>可不可以解釋多一點

基督徒要跟隨上帝既意思做人
上帝既意思只係聖經出現
聖經自相矛盾
基督徒跟咩先好？

>是否自相矛盾還要再作研究。

4福音對耶穌復活都有唔同口供，係咪自相矛盾？
上帝教人愛人如己但又叫基督徒殺外邦人，自相矛盾？
...


>為什麼要信自相矛盾的一本書？因它太吸引了。
你既理性係邊？

>「上帝為我地而死，係令我地唔洗受懲罰o者~」
>不是不用受罰,而是從無期徒刑減輕至有期徒刑。
？？？
無期徒刑指永火
咁有期徒刑指咩？

>女人生子問題也解決了。
能解釋多一次嘛？
我get唔到點解決

>那人是因其中一個原因而犯錯，也就沒是有利用到別的原因，那麼別的原因就不成立嗎？

你當初講左呢一句
>是自由意志,「聖經有誤」是自由而致。

我只係想用例子說明你所講既自由*未必*會引起錯誤
我認為基督教所講既「自由意志」(假如真係有既話)只係用黎解釋道德有關既「錯誤」
卻唔係用黎解釋聖經有誤既原因

>我因思想混亂，算出１＋１＝３，而神為了結果正確，於是改變了的的思想，那麼，我就不會犯錯了，不過，也同時地沒有了思想自由。反之，神沒有改變我的思想，但算錯了數，我卻有思想自由，神最後選擇了後者。

假如我計左1+1=3，上帝為左結果正確，除左可以改變我既思想外，仲可以有一個choice(至少)，就係將1+1=3當係o岩既
咁樣既話，我地冇犯錯，同時有思想自由

假如你要追究犯錯最最最深入既原因既話，你只可以怪上帝創造左一種叫錯誤既野出黎，整個窿出黎畀你踩

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.