I don't think she said that, did she? Just that at that point in Brotherhood, Stephan probably hadn't acted on his inclinations. We don't know what happened, or might happen, later. -- LJG Discussion board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, April 20, 0:15:13 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:21:23 12/31/07 Mon
Author: maddiej
Subject: I don't think she said that, did she? Just that at that point in Brotherhood, Stephan probably hadn't acted on his inclinations. We don't know what happened, or might happen, later.
In reply to: Karen 's message, "I think you're right. And this is also a parallel to Lord John's relationship with Jamie, which will (eventually) get to a similar state. I think we have to take Diana at her word here; if she says the relationship didn't go further than a close friendship, then we have to accept that." on 16:01:16 12/31/07 Mon

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Actually, I think the part Jane quoted above from Chapter 26 of BOTB answers that question. No matter how much either of them may have desired the other, they can't acknowledge their feelings. Unless we find out otherwise in SCOTTISH PRISONER, I think we have to leave it at that. A close friendship, to be sure, but not a sexual relationship. (NT) -- Karen, 17:04:32 12/31/07 Mon
- Well, no, that wasn't my point. I think that John and Stephan are both seriously contemplating a relationship. The thing with Percy and Webber has them more frightened than ever to act on their feelings. Remember when Stephan told John about the Prussian king? I think the point of Stephan mentioning THAT was to put John at ease about the ability of people to look the other way. I am STILL hoping both men will get what they want, whatever that might be, in Scottish Prisoner. In my heart I refuse to believe herself could have built this relationship for us between these two AMAZING characters for more than three years and NOT give us some satisfaction. I am in wait and see mode myself. (NT) -- Jane, 09:56:04 01/01/08 Tue

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.