VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Friday, May 24, 7:20:13Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:12:41 09/06/07 Thu
Author: Conmama
Subject: Thanks...but see my question above. Do you know why he would continue to use the title for an Earl, then? Why an Earl and not a Duke?
In reply to: CherylR 's message, "If you scroll down quite aways on this page you will find this question addressed. Someone said that Royals often hold more than one title and are just known by their most important. The example given is that Prince Charles is Prince of Wales but also Duke of Rothesay and Lord of the Ilses........who knew? I guess it was a message that Hal sent to others that he would not use his title of Duke until his Father's name was cleared." on 14:52:33 09/05/07 Wed


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:





[ Contact Forum Admin ]




Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.