VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]789 ]
Subject: 唔……


Author:
書生小賢
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 02:29:38 11/30/04 Tue
In reply to: 天力 's message, "回應" on 13:17:15 11/29/04 Mon

上主選擇童女生子,不是素來都是說在<舊約>中有依據的嗎?

有點我不明白:
你說「後來的福音書中的借用肯定是加入了自己的詮釋,不可能視為對以賽亞書的直接對應」,如果是故意與沒有寫明是童貞女的<以賽亞書>拉關連,福音的作者更不應該寫成「童貞女」,因為這是101%根據,是「附加」了新事物。要是福音的作者是為了故意迎合,那更應倒過來故意把貞女的事實刪去。

換個看法,要是聖母不是童貞女,福音書的作者硬把她說是童貞女,那豈不是<聖經>裡有謊話了?
這麼說,我們信仰的最重要根據便成為不可信了。

上主的作為,並非每一件事都有我們愛追蹤的「重要性」。
上主顯示祂奇妙的作為,本身不就是最重要了嗎?

用楊牧谷在<基本信仰與超凡生命(漫畫版)>的說法:
「若沒有信心的話,即使運用最先進的攝製器材,將耶穌基督復活的過程呈現在廣大觀眾前,只會惹起一陣驚訝之情而已……『光學特技這部份還可以……』……信心的層面,往往比我們眼所見的層面來得高深。」

希望大家都在討論中,在信仰上有所增長∼

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
不要過份依賴某些"信仰根據"Liberal03:10:21 11/30/04 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.