VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]789 ]
Subject: 回應


Author:
天力
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:17:15 11/29/04 Mon
In reply to: 天力 's message, "奧修答客問:耶穌的媽媽為甚麼是童貞?" on 13:32:48 11/26/04 Fri

其實我不是著重要為科學與信仰搭橋,因為我絕不反對神蹟
神蹟有何不可呢
但問題是童女生子有冇必要?
其中的意義是什麼?
因為沒有男人的參與,就沒有從阿當而來的罪性?這個看法我認為是充滿著後人的建構
而且正如liberal兄所言,在解經上很明顯是從以賽亞書的童女而來
傳統上認為耶穌是實現了以賽亞書的預言云云
但第一以賽亞書的經文肯定不是如此解法---那兒所講的是有少婦產子
而後來的福音書中的借用肯定是加入了自己的詮釋,不可能視為對以賽亞書的直接對應
而且對耶穌的看法很多時也受著傳統文化的影響,那些對耶穌的描繪為了實現舊約「預言」而成,那些是按實情描繪呢?那些是神話呢?
即是否要我們把其神話外衣除去而看見當中的信息的呢?
我相信有很多可以探討的地方

不過,最重要的是這些看法對我們有何影響,起碼,我就看不到要把馬利亞視為處女生子有何重要性,對我們有何影響呢?對我們有何幫助呢?
反而奧修的看法卻對我有很大幫助

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
唔……書生小賢02:29:38 11/30/04 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.