VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]789 ]
Subject: 作者原意論已破產也是一個普通常識


Author:
維記
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:28:31 12/02/04 Thu
In reply to: bezaleel 's message, "聖經" on 18:04:11 11/25/04 Thu

>我們相信作者的原意是正確的,

作者原意論並不能提供清晰和確切的理論支持,
簡單舉個例子,
若你拿起自己幾年前寫的文章,
你很可能不知道自己曾經寫過這篇文篇,
更遑論確切地知道自己當時的所謂文本原意;
然而更重要的是,
你提到的"了解上下文、原文、文化及歷史背景、和文體",
極其量也只可以"找"到"文本"而非文本"作者"的意思,
而且這樣作的結果其實也只是在敘述另一個經過銓釋後的新文本而已.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.