VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:36:22 11/12/05 Sat
Author: Truthfully
Subject: Re: New Orleans
In reply to: Matthew Villani 's message, "Re: New Orleans" on 12:44:21 11/11/05 Fri

>>I'm not much into this whole "Pan - Aryan" deal like
>>Stormfronters are (I'll assume you're one). The so
>>called "White" hispanics are just a mix of the native
>>non -White Hispanics and Spaniards. Spanish blood
>>entered Hispanic people courtesy of Spanish soldiers
>>jerking off when Spain had an empire. The only ture
>>White Hispanics in my opinion are the Argentines.
>
>Actually, I've mostly rejected Stormfront because
>they're not pan-Aryan enough for me. I'm a PANFer
>mostly.
>
>In many cases you're right, but in other cases they
>were smart enough to bring their own women with them.
>Cuba is a good example of this, which used to be 73%
>White, but has now dropped to 37% due to the mass
>exodus thanks to Castro.
>
>>All this Pan Aryan shit is every bit as bad as the
>>multiculturalists wanting to mix all races together. I
>>say this, not only are different races unique, but so
>>are different ethnicities and sub groups of the same
>>race. It's my sincere belief that Cetlic, Nordics,
>>Mediterraneans, Slavics, and any White sub group
>>should stick to their own.
>
>Pan-Aryanism doesn't oppose sub-racial preservation,
>but it also doesn't oppose sub-racial mixing, even
>though sub-racial intermixing has been going on for
>millenia. In the old world, I'd strongly support
>sub-racial preservation, but not at the cost of
>killing White-on-White relationships, but in the new
>world and Australia, so many people are a mixture of
>various ethnicities that it wouldn't really be
>feasable.

Why not? Sure inter-ethnic mixing has been going on for millennia, but even today, the trend for most ethnic groups is STILL to stick to and marry one of their own. It's certainly feasible because preservation of ethnic bloodlines is still being done uncousciously.

>
>>I also believe that if there should be any inter
>>ethnic mixing, then it should be between groups who
>>shae similar triats (i.e. Nords and Celts). IMO,
>>constantly mixing, say Germanics and Meds is a bad
>>idea. It just muddles up bloodlines, despite the fact
>>that the offspring are still White.
>
>Actually, Scandanavian Nords are closer related to
>Meds than they are to Celts (many Nords are merely
>depigmented Meds), however I see no qualms with Nord,
>Celt, Slav, Med, Armenoid, Uralic, Finno-Ugaric, etc
>mixing.

I disagree. If you read accounts from Julius Caesar or even Tacitus, they report Celts as being very homogeneous, with their tall, ruddy, and muscular statures. This also held true for the ancient inhabitants of Germania, and we both know those traits are typical of your common Nord as well.
Not all, but a significant majority are.
Your typical med is much shorter, has a smaller skeletal structure, darker, and has that "greasy" look. An example of a true Med that could be related to Nords would be the blonde haired, blue eyed Northern Italians or Northern Spaniards. In fact, you should do some reserach on the region of Caledonia in Spain. You would think you're in Ireland if you went there and saw the people - tall, pale skinned, blue/green eyes, blonde/bropwn/red hair. The works.
So my point is, it really isn't all that un-feasible to encourage ethnic preservation, it's still being done. Yes I know it would be boring to just stick to one particular ethnicity after a while and that's why I would approve of Celtic types mixing with Germanic types with Baltic/Slavonic types. Not only does (phenotype play a role, but culture as well. NW European peoples have a different culture than Meds (frankly I think a lot of Meds today just have big mouths)and their ways of thinking are different.
It's best if people who share similar phenotypic, cultural, and attitude traits come together. Bloodlines are better preserved.
However, This isn't to say that different European ethnics shouldn't mix at all. But I wouldn't encourage too much of it. The we wouldn't know who's who.
>
>>And personally I would sorely miss not having anymore
>>tall, ruddy, light haired, muscular people around.
>>Especially if Celtic and Nordic women were to be mixed
>>with either dark, short, "greasy" Meds, or flat out
>>non Whites.
>
>I don't see an end of Celts or Nords at all, since
>there are Celts in certain parts of Europe scattered
>about, and plenty of Nords in Russia. I especially say
>that Celts will be just fine because there are a lot
>of Celts in the US and the original Celts survived
>slight admixture with Atlanto-Meds just fine. There
>are actually Pan-Aryans that share your views on
>sub-racial preservation, however, we all agree that in
>the new world and Australia, sub-racial mixing is
>prominent, and I'm actually a result of sub-racial
>mixing (I have nord, med, celt, and possibly some
>slavic blood in me). To paraphrase, Pan-Aryanism isn't
>about creating a White superstate, but it is about
>creating alliances against the real enemies (the jews
>and the non-Whites).

I spend some time on Amren. Their views are pretty similar to mine when it comes to sub-racial preservation.
Let's face it, if we mixed ALL Whites together, it would be really fucking boring. Think of it like this: "Hey what are you?" The reply: "Well let's see, I'm Irish, German, Italians, Ukrainian, Russian, Hungarian, Greek, Swedish, etc." That's NOT what I want to see, and I know plenty of people who share my views. I don't hate anyone who comes from multiple backgrounds, I just want to see bloodlines preserved and continue.
About what you said about the Celts, if only all the Celts scattered across mainland Europe would come together and unitw with Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, they could have a sort of a re-birth of the power they enjoyed millennia ago. Just having them being scattered all over doesn't sit well with me. I'd like to see them together again, putting factional differences aside, procreating, and thriving. After all, the Celts did rule Europe for centuries before the Romans came on the scene. Sadly, Celtic infighting did them in more than the Roman invasions did. But that's another story for another time.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.