VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:58:55 11/12/05 Sat
Author: Matthew Villani
Subject: Re: New Orleans
In reply to: Truthfully 's message, "Re: New Orleans" on 08:36:22 11/12/05 Sat

>Why not? Sure inter-ethnic mixing has been going on
>for millennia, but even today, the trend for most
>ethnic groups is STILL to stick to and marry one of
>their own. It's certainly feasible because
>preservation of ethnic bloodlines is still being done
>uncousciously.

I think before we can focus in sub-racial preservation in the old world we should focus on racial preservation. I'm not opposed to someone wanting to stick to their own ethnicity, however, I am opposed to the idea of breaking up White-on-White unions.

>I disagree. If you read accounts from Julius Caesar or
>even Tacitus, they report Celts as being very
>homogeneous, with their tall, ruddy, and muscular
>statures. This also held true for the ancient
>inhabitants of Germania, and we both know those traits
>are typical of your common Nord as well.

There are small amounts of Atlanto-Med admixture, however it is, as I said, small. Most of the Atlanto-Meds are confined to the southern part of the British Isles.

>Not all, but a significant majority are.
>Your typical med is much shorter, has a smaller
>skeletal structure, darker, and has that "greasy"
>look.

A lot of that has to do with the typical med diet. In the US, the average height of meds is taller than in the old world. But regardless, there are going to be some height differences between different subraces. Compare the Bantu to your average Negro for example.

>An example of a true Med that could be related
>to Nords would be the blonde haired, blue eyed
>Northern Italians or Northern Spaniards.

Actually, those are mixtures of Meds and Nords. However, those areas still have a strong Med presence, but not as strong as in the southern regions of those countries.

>In fact, you
>should do some reserach on the region of Caledonia in
>Spain. You would think you're in Ireland if you went
>there and saw the people - tall, pale skinned,
>blue/green eyes, blonde/bropwn/red hair. The works.

Will do.

>So my point is, it really isn't all that un-feasible
>to encourage ethnic preservation, it's still being
>done. Yes I know it would be boring to just stick to
>one particular ethnicity after a while and that's why
>I would approve of Celtic types mixing with Germanic
>types with Baltic/Slavonic types. Not only does
>(phenotype play a role, but culture as well. NW
>European peoples have a different culture than Meds

That wasn't really that true a hundred years ago or so. The modern nordic culture really isn't White culture at all. Modern NW European culture is that "tolerance" bullshit. The best solution would be to return to a culture similar to the one before the Jew invasion and go from there, after kicking out the NW Somolians and Pakis.

>(frankly I think a lot of Meds today just have big
>mouths)and their ways of thinking are different.

The same could be said of any ethnicity, really. Every type of ethnicity has its loudmouth boasters.

>It's best if people who share similar phenotypic,
>cultural, and attitude traits come together.
>Bloodlines are better preserved.
>However, This isn't to say that different European
>ethnics shouldn't mix at all. But I wouldn't encourage
>too much of it. The we wouldn't know who's who.

Believe it or not, there are quite a few that share that view, however, although I agree partially with it, like I said, it shouldn't be to the extent that it breaks apart White-on-White relationships, and I think it can only be applied to the Old World.

>I spend some time on Amren. Their views are pretty
>similar to mine when it comes to sub-racial
>preservation.
>Let's face it, if we mixed ALL Whites together, it
>would be really fucking boring. Think of it like this:
>"Hey what are you?" The reply: "Well let's see, I'm
>Irish, German, Italians, Ukrainian, Russian,
>Hungarian, Greek, Swedish, etc." That's NOT what I
>want to see, and I know plenty of people who share my
>views.

Believe me, I'm NOT looking to establish some White superstate of mixing all Whites into one single ethnicity. However, in the US, the example you provided is pretty much true for a lot of American Whites. I just recognize that the situation in the new world and Australia is different from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East.

>I don't hate anyone who comes from multiple
>backgrounds, I just want to see bloodlines preserved
>and continue.

That can be arranged in the old world once the jewish and NW problems are all solved and the gliberal establishments are crushed for all time.

>About what you said about the Celts, if only all the
>Celts scattered across mainland Europe would come
>together and unitw with Ireland, Scotland, and Wales,
>they could have a sort of a re-birth of the power they
>enjoyed millennia ago. Just having them being
>scattered all over doesn't sit well with me. I'd like
>to see them together again, putting factional
>differences aside, procreating, and thriving. After
>all, the Celts did rule Europe for centuries before
>the Romans came on the scene. Sadly, Celtic infighting
>did them in more than the Roman invasions did. But
>that's another story for another time.

I'd say what really needs to happen is that the Celts in Ireland need to kick out all of the Negroes and Pakis, and start having more kids per family, and then whatever problems there were would then be solved. I like the idea personally of a widespread Celtic presence. Despite my Italian surname, I have as much or more Irish than Italian blood in me, so I definately sympathize with matters concerning the Irish as well as Italian. I'm what you might call a Heinz 57 (I have 10 or more ethnicities).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.