Author:
non-smoking planet lover
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 07/29/06 5:39pm
In reply to:
l
's message, "warming naysayers misuse research results" on 07/28/06 4:47pm
The CORRUPT RICHARD S. LINDZEN,
DESPICABLE OUTCAST OF SCIENCE
Lindzen CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to DEFRAUD. Three front organs used, and a few key people aiding and abetting FELONY.
Interactive Version Online.
Additional FELONY CONSPIRATORS at TechCentralStation
Interactive Version Online.
Additional FELONY CONSPIRATORS at Cato Institute Interactive Version Online.
Some linkages between FELON S. Fred Singer and FELON Sallie Baliunas collections of whorehouses.
Interactive Version Online.
In 1993 documents appeared in secret tobacco conspiracy file cabinets about a fake science conference organized by the documented corrupt S. Fred Singer. This meeting in Washington, DC, was facetiously titled "Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process", funded by two lung-killer industries tobacco and asbestos, and Lindzen was a prominant hoaxer at this event. Lindzen has been paid in a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to defraud the public on the immanent dangers of Global Warming, just as he participated with co-conspirators to aid Singer's science hoaxes on behalf of tobacco and asbestos SERIAL MURDERER CORPORATIONS.
Every single fact below can stand up in court in the trial of Lindzen for FELONY CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. Much more incriminating evidence will be adduced at trial.
Google search engine reports 164 results looking for Richard S. Lindzen AND "Washington Times" owned by the convicted felon Sun Myung Moon. Moon has hosted many fake science conferences to exploit for propaganda purposes. Singer apprenteced the fake science conference back when Singer was President of the moonie "Washingon Institute for Values in Public Policy". No records exist in public archives on what Moon paid Singer as president of the Wash Inst, but here is a link showing how generous Moon is to one successor president after Singer's term -- $142,708/yr salary.
Moon is master of money laundering and subversive payoffs -- we will never know who all he paid and how much they pocketed. We do know that Google search engine finds 152 webpages linking Moon AND Lindzen. There is an unseemly association between a science corruptor and a known identified corrupt Lindzen: 314 webpage results for Lindzen AND "Sun Myung Moon" OR "Washington Times".
http://tobaccodocuments.org/mayo_clinic/2025498346.html SUBJECT: The Heidelberg Appeal Date: 23 Mar 1993
BACKGROUND
This coalition has its roots in the asbestos industry, but has become a broad and independent movement in a littlc bit less than a year. We are involved with the coalition through the French NMA, but we are being discreet because some of the coalition members are concerned about a "tobacco connection".
Our strategy is to continue discreetly supporting the coalition and help it grow in size and credibility. The timing is particularly opportune because of Bill Clinton's sympathy to the messages of the coalition (see attached IHT article).
(Philip Morris Documents)
Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process Semi-Final Program
Richard S. Lindzen
Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, a distinguished professor of meteorology at MIT, is one of a small band of global warming skeptics used by industry to undermine and delay any kind of regulatory action meant to address the looming environmental crisis.
Lindzen was reported in 1995 to "charges oil and coal interests $2,500 a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels, and a speech he wrote, entitled 'Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,' was underwritten by OPEC." [1]
According to Ross Gelbspan, Lindzen and skeptics like him -- including Dr. Pat Michaels, Dr. Robert Balling, Dr. Sherwood Idso, and Dr. S. Fred Singer, among others -- "assert flatly that their science is untainted by funding. Nevertheless, in this persistent and well-funded campaign of [global warming] denial they have become interchangeable ornaments on the hood of a high-powered engine of disinformation. Their dissenting opinions are amplified beyond all proportion through the media while the concerns of the dominant majority of the world's scientific establishment are marginalized. By keeping the discussion focused on whether there is a problem in the first place, they have effectively silenced the debate over what to do about it." [2]
... The people who run the world's oil and coal companies know that the march of science, and of political action, may be slowed by disinformation. In the last year and a half, one of the leading oil industry public relations outlets, the Global Climate Coalition, has spent more than a million dollars to downplay the threat of climate change. It expects to spend another $850,000 on the issue next year. Similarly, the National Coal Association spent more than $700,000 on the global climate issue in 1992 and 1993. In 1993 alone, the American Petroleum Institute, just one of fifty-four industry members of the GCC, paid $1.8 million to the public relations firm of Burson-Marsteller partly in an effort to defeat a proposed tax on fossil fuels. For perspective, this is only slightly less than the combined yearly expenditures on global warming of the five major environmental groups that focus on climate issues -- about $2.1 million, according to officials of the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the World Wildlife Fund.
For the most part the industry has relied on a small band of skeptics -- Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Dr. Pat Michaels, Dr. Robert Balling, Dr. Sherwood Idso, and Dr. S. Fred Singer, among others -- who have proven extraordinarily adept at draining the issue of all sense of crisis. Through their frequent pronouncements in the press and on radio and television, they have helped to create the illusion that the question is hopelessly mired in unknowns. Most damaging has been their influence on decision makers; their contrarian views have allowed conservative Republicans such as Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.) to dismiss legitimate research concerns as "liberal claptrap" and have provided the basis for the recent round of budget cuts to those government science programs designed to monitor the health of the planet.
Last May, Minnesota held hearings in St. Paul to determine the environmental cost of coal burning by state power plants. Three of the skeptics -- Lindzen, Michaels, and Balling -- were hired as expert witnesses to testify on behalf of Western Fuels Association, a $400 million consortium of coal suppliers and coal-fired utilities. [#1] ...
[#l In 1991, Western Fuels spent an estimated $250,000 to produce and distribute a video entitled "The Greening of Planet Earth," which was shown frequently inside the Bush White House as well as within the governments of OPEC. In near-evangelical tones, the video promises that a new age of agricultural abundance will result from increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide. It portrays a world where vast areas of desert are reclaimed by the carbon dioxide-forced growth of new grasslands, where the earth's diminishing forests are replenished by a nurturing atmosphere. Unfortunately, it overlooks the bugs. Experts note that even a minor elevation in temperature would trigger an explosion in the planet's insect population, leading to potentially significant disruptions in food supplies from crop damage as well as to a surge in insect-borne diseases. It appears that Western Fuels' video fails to tell people what the termites in New Orleans may be trying to tell them now.]
SOME SCIENTISTS ARE PAID TO LIE BY BIG OIL AND COAL COMPANIES.
We no longer need scientists to tell us the truth when it gets big enough: we have a BIG CONSPIRACY with FELONY INTENT TO DEFRAUD operated by people who match the medical definition of insane (Sociopath, antisocial personality disorder).
It really is that simple: FIRST you check the scientists credentials against the investigative teams hunting out the sicko psycho mad scientists -- if they work for poison & pollution industy, you skip reading anything they have to say.
Famous psychopaths once worked for the Tobacco Conspiracy, now work for ExxonMobil on the anti-science frauds and hoaxes.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 