VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Re: sounds of silence


Author:
Zisel ben
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 15:19:46 03/16/01 Fri
In reply to: derek 's message, "Re: sounds of silence" on 13:16:55 03/16/01 Fri

I'm not sure if this is a rhetorical question or not but since I love to humor rhetorical questions I will answer it:

No, I don't want a sound-bite of Anthony's voice.

Why do you ask?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: Re: sounds of silence


Author:
derek
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:16:04 03/19/01 Mon

No, that was not a rhetorical question, it was an inquiry to the meaning of your seemingly ad-hoc questioning of Anthony's reasons for doing this site. I mean your argument had the validity of "what if c- a- t really spelled dog? You mentioned that he is silent unless his words are spoken and I think this is a point that is so absurd that it warrants questioning why you stated it. for if that was what you were really trying to say, then I would think you are negating every author and thinker that ever lived with out having their voice recorded and played to the masses. As for your apparent sarcasm toward me, that is fine, just try not to argue on points that have no merit, and start asking relevant questions.

And, I am glad that you feel you have won a "victory" over Anthony in getting him to see his views in a different light "so quickly." Yet I feel a remorse that he even conceded any points to you. And the fact that you think those out there searching on the internet do not need to read this stuff because they are out there exploring and looking for answers is just....blah. I mean you give internet users waaaaaay to much credit. If anyone in the world is "locked" into a certain frame of mind (in my experience) it is people who thrive on technological advancement and pratically worship this new medium.

I mean if anyone is more cynical or hell bent on the supremacy of their craft it would be those that I have met in this field. I am just furious at the fact that we as a people, species whatever feel that technolgy is the single mobilizer and answer giver is just disgusting. I feel it can help and that it is a tool, but at the end ofthe day, a computer is a dmb machine that is worthless unless it has a humna running it. I think we all forget that anymore.


look all I really wanted to know was why you questioned soemthing so simple and take it for the literal, mind numbing truth. Have some imagination, think, offer, don't just try question when questioning is not needed.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: cdaotggtoadc


Author:
Zisel ben
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:00:38 03/19/01 Mon

Well, derek,

It seems you have a little too much hostility towards your fellow thinkers when they express views you aren't in complete agreement with or that you don't immediately understand.

A couple of things I would like to clear up...

"As for your apparent sarcasm toward me, that is fine..."

My sarcasm obviously set you off, which is why you felt the need to dive in and spew venom into this discussion.

"I am glad that you feel you have won a "victory" over Anthony"
I don't feel as though I have conquered Anthony's freedom of thought in any manner. Is that even possible? hmmmm...anyway, that is a misconstrued assumption and you are underestimating his intregity by saying that he is "conceding" to me simply because he kept an open mind during our conversation.

Oh and in case you didn't read between the lines yet:
I am not interested in conversing with or pursuing a "victory" over YOU so don't bother inciting discussion with me.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.