| Subject: I ain't no fortunate son... |
Author: Anthony [ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 12:46:57 04/17/01 Tue
As far as Derek's essay series concerning how many Americans have a resentment for those that are rich and "successful", I have a few thoughts. For my own part, I was raised in what I consider to be a lower middle class family. Most of my close relatives work in trades such as masonry, carpentry, baking, carpet laying, etc.
Now, growing up in this way, I saw among my relatives a disdain for the well off, the highly educated, the just plain rich. Now, I think that a certain amount of this comes from plain old envy, you know? I mean, who would not want to have the easy life that pleny of money affords?
So I ask Derek, hasn't it always been this way? There have always been haves and have nots, correct? The plebians and the particians? So I posit that this resentment of the successful is nothing new, and the only reason it is growing is because there is a corresponding decrease in the number of people holding the majority of the wealth in this country.
Now, I don't particularly like percentages. I think they are more often than not inaccurate and far from all-inclusive measures of reality. But can anyone tell me how much truth is in the infamous statistic that claims there is a wealthy 3-5% that controls 80-95% of the wealth in America? (NOTE: I gave ranges to those percentages because I have heard varying numbers). If this IS the case, I think it is no mystery as to why there is such a resentment for the rich.
In my opinion, the major beef of those that occupy the lesser economic ranges is toward the very fact that the rich are rich, and NOT about whether the rich are taxed accordingly. The taxation thing is salt in the wound, if you will, insult to injury.
Don't know if this makes any solid points or not. Just wanted to respond with my initial thoughts after rereading Derek's latest Rant.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
| | Replies: | |
|