VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sun February 24, 2019 09:09:53Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456789 ]
Subject: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
倪尻子
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:56:59 05/22/09 Fri
In reply to: 超人梅比斯 's message, "Re: 選舉最有問題的老師" on 09:00:50 05/14/09 Thu

>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>
>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>
>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>
>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處

本人認為最有問題是Tom Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相反,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"煎",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為沒有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無謂搞咁多野去曬學生時間。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
林敏聰
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:21:49 05/22/09 Fri

>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>
>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>
>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>
>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>
>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相反
>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"煎
>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為沒
>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無�
>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。

有時又真係的 這樣罰會浪費學生的溫習時間 損人不利己
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
學生
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:49:42 05/23/09 Sat

>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>
>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>
>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>
>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>
>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相反
>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"煎
>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為沒
>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無�
>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
即是說你沒反省過
學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom Chan沒做錯
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan真是最有問題的老師


Author:
扒王平哥
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:25:09 05/24/09 Sun

>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>
>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>
>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>
>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>
>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相�
>�
>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"�
>�
>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為�
>S
>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無
>�
>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>即是說你沒反省過
>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>Chan沒做錯

請問Tom Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan真是最有問題的老師


Author:
M智
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:07:41 06/06/09 Sat

>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>
>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>>
>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>
>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>
>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相
>�
>>�
>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"
>�
>>�
>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為
>�
>>S
>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,�
>L
>>�
>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>即是說你沒反省過
>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>Chan沒做錯
>
>請問Tom Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?

Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同 chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir 好d
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
Louis wool
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:01:35 06/06/09 Sat

>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>>>
>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>
>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>
>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛
>"
>>�
>>>�
>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認�
>�
>>�
>>>S
>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,
>�
>>L
>>>�
>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>Chan沒做錯
>>
>>請問Tom Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>
>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>好d

我個人都覺得Zinc 同 Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁 d 就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
TKP
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:56:24 06/06/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>等等
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>
>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩�
>�
>>"
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>S
>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數�
>A
>>�
>>>L
>>>>�
>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>
>>>請問Tom
>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>
>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>好d
>
>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁 d
>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。

記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
史巴詩星人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:45:59 06/08/09 Mon

>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>等等
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>
>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩
>�
>>�
>>>"
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人�
>{
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>S
>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數
>�
>>A
>>>�
>>>>L
>>>>>�
>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>
>>>>請問Tom
>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>
>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>>好d
>>
>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁 d
>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>
>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .

Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
Amaths 王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:54:41 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>"
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人
>�
>>{
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算�
>�
>>�
>>>A
>>>>�
>>>>>L
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>
>>>>>請問Tom
>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>>>好d
>>>
>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>d
>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>
>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>
>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎

Tom Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
Oiloon
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:47:17 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>"
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本�
>H
>>�
>>>{
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>A
>>>>>�
>>>>>>L
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>>
>>>>>>請問Tom
>>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同
>程sir
>>>>>好d
>>>>
>>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>>d
>>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>>
>>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>>
>>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
>
>Tom Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form

Tom Chan form3個時做我班主任,個時唔記得係咪日子,有一排要捐錢,咁人人都捐散子,跟住Tom Chan 叫人幫手 "唱" 散子,得好少人肯唱,最後Tom Chan 是但選幾個人,然後迫人唱散子,我覺得佢咁做有佢的理由,但未免太硬來了,為此等小事令到學生不高興,不太值得。
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
阿達
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:36:31 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>"
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本
>�
>>H
>>>�
>>>>{
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>A
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>L
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為To
>m
>>>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>請問Tom
>>>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同
>>程sir
>>>>>>好d
>>>>>
>>>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom
>Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>>>d
>>>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>>>
>>>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>>>
>>>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
>>
>>Tom
>Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form
>
>Tom Chan
>form3個時做我班主任,個時唔記得係咪日子,有一排要捐錢,
>咁人人都捐散子,跟住Tom Chan 叫人幫手 "唱"
>散子,得好少人肯唱,最後Tom Chan
>是但選幾個人,然後迫人唱散子,我覺得佢咁做有佢的理由,�
>蹵憫K太硬來了,為此等小事令到學生不高興,不太值得。

同意 有時佢只聽片面之詞 就懲罰同學 跟Miss On一樣 問都唔問清楚
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:12:26 06/10/09 Wed

算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工, 唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味! 我係佢索性唔做好過.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:
DavidM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:48:21 06/11/09 Thu

>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>我係佢索性唔做好過.


Tom Chan有返工又點,
教得唔好,
做得唔好,
我係Tom Chan就會做好d
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:
Fa Yin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:43:13 06/11/09 Thu

>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>
>
>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>教得唔好,
>做得唔好,
>我係Tom Chan就會做好d

Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom Chan係咁咦say sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
kai 正
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:27:59 06/14/09 Sun

>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>教得唔好,
>>做得唔好,
>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>
>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>Chan係咁咦say
>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!

我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥搞事
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:06:21 06/15/09 Mon

>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>教得唔好,
>>>做得唔好,
>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>
>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>Chan係咁咦say
>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>
>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥�
>d事

tom chan 好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人都唔like佢
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
手指長
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:29:10 06/16/09 Tue

>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>
>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>
>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥
>�
>>d事
>
>tom chan
>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人�
>ㄜ鷲ike佢

Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 心水清的人應該發現


Author:
過氣校友
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:03:35 06/17/09 Wed

心水清的人應該發現, 這一大堆回應是來自同一人. 相信亦是在九濟堂不斷侮辱同學, 老師的那位5E學生.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 心水清的人應該發現


Author:
asd
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:16:12 06/18/09 Thu

>心水清的人應該發現, 這一大堆回應是來自同一人.
>相信亦是在九濟堂不斷侮辱同學, 老師的那位5E學生.
雖然你地可能真係同一個人
不過TOMCHAN真係教得唔係好dim!
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
愛校人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:41:47 06/17/09 Wed

>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>
>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手�
>d
>>�
>>>d事
>>
>>tom chan
>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人
>�
>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>
>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他

同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
博士
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:20:10 06/18/09 Thu

>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>
>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手
>�
>>d
>>>�
>>>>d事
>>>
>>>tom chan
>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多�
>H
>>�
>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>
>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>
>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生

為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,form3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
IQ<100 100%仆街 的人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:48:36 07/28/09 Tue

>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>
>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打?>?>>�
>>>d
>>>>�
>>>>>d事
>>>>
>>>>tom chan
>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多
>�
>>H
>>>�
>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>
>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>
>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>
>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,for
>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
Billy仔話要Rap 一 rap, 就唔會sad, 玩gap gap, 洗pat pat
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:50:36 07/31/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打
>?>?>>�
>>>>d
>>>>>�
>>>>>>d事
>>>>>
>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好�
>h
>>�
>>>H
>>>>�
>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>
>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>
>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>
>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,fo
>r
>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.


咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
海狗王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:54:54 08/01/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>d
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>
>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好
>�
>>h
>>>�
>>>>H
>>>>>�
>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>
>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>
>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>
>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,f
>o
>>r
>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>
>
>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理


Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
我愛Tom Chan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:42:59 08/07/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個
>�
>>�
>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•�
>n
>>�
>>>h
>>>>�
>>>>>H
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>
>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>
>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判�
>_
>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>
>>
>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>
>
>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?


Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
Angel
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:03:07 08/14/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•
>�
>>n
>>>�
>>>>h
>>>>>�
>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>
>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>
>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判
>�
>>_
>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>
>>>
>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>
>
>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人


係咪呀,我唔係幾信
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
種金的人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:56:47 08/15/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!
>!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做�
>E
>>�
>>>n
>>>>�
>>>>>h
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>
>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form
>2
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下�
>P
>>�
>>>_
>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>
>
>係咪呀,我唔係幾信

你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:04:40 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對
>!
>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派?>X
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做
>�
>>E
>>>�
>>>>n
>>>>>�
>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,for
>m
>>2
>>>,
>>>>f
>>>>>o
>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下
>�
>>P
>>>�
>>>>_
>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>
>>
>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>
>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =

讀得好唔代表惜教書
30分大晒咩!!
教得唔好就唔好教la
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
狗神
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:35:29 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答�
>�
>>!
>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派
>?>X
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎�
>�
>>�
>>>E
>>>>�
>>>>>n
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,fo
>r
>>m
>>>2
>>>>,
>>>>>f
>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才�
>U
>>�
>>>P
>>>>�
>>>>>_
>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>
>>>
>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>
>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>
>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>30分大晒咩!!
>教得唔好就唔好教la

nelson教得最好
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:40:47 09/01/09 Tue

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答
>�
>>�
>>>!
>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前�
>�
>>?>X
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>E
>>>>>�
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,f
>o
>>r
>>>m
>>>>2
>>>>>,
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才
>�
>>U
>>>�
>>>>P
>>>>>�
>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>
>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>
>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>30分大晒咩!!
>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>
>nelson教得最好

Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in his lessons.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
Current Boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:51:27 09/04/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>!
>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前
>�
>>�
>>>?>X
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>E
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m
>>>>>2
>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚?>~
>>�
>>>U
>>>>�
>>>>>P
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>
>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>
>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>
>>nelson教得最好
>
>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>his lessons.


Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on that topic.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Nelson Fung一定是最好的老師,nelson最好


Author:
講手王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:00:59 09/24/09 Thu

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>!
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之�
>e
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>X
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚
>?>~
>>>�
>>>>U
>>>>>�
>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>
>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>
>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>
>>>nelson教得最好
>>
>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>his lessons.
>
>
>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>that topic.


佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: miss chung著衫有d出位...


Author:
新人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:29:23 11/08/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的�
>H
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之
>�
>>e
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>X
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form
>1
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m
>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清�
>�
>>?>~
>>>>�
>>>>>U
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>>
>>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>>
>>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>>
>>>>nelson教得最好
>>>
>>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>>his lessons.
>>
>>
>>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>>that topic.
>
>
>佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁


miss chung著衫有d出位...算唔算有問題?
[> [> [> [> Subject: 李秀容是最有問題的老師


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:26:26 09/23/09 Wed

>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>
>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>
>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>
>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>
>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相反
>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"煎
>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為沒
>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無�
>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。

佢很串,常單打學生,玩針對,我是佢個班就知,一做錯事就以後比佢針對
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Maggie Lee是最有問題的老師


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:06:44 09/23/09 Wed

>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>
>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>
>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>
>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>
>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相�
>�
>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"�
>�
>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為�
>S
>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,無
>�
>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>
>佢很串,常單打學生,玩針對,我是佢個班就知,一做錯事就以後�
>鯓\針對

佢而家教我英文...成日要我地做news assignment.好慘啊
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 珍惜吧


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:40:18 09/23/09 Wed

>佢而家教我英文...成日要我地做news assignment.好慘啊

Maggie Li肯給您們功課, 努力谷你. 感恩都來唔切啦.

以前修士教書時代, 英文寫得唔好修士可是要把學生書包掉落街的. 這種教育出來的學生英文就十分優秀.

Maggie Li肯給您們功課就好俾心機了! 有師弟講, 俾關xx教過英文就知道什麼是到考A-level前UE還有二分一個syllabus是未教的.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Maggie Lee是最有問題的老師


Author:
新boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:14:56 12/18/09 Fri

>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>
>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>>
>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>
>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>
>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨相
>�
>>�
>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛"
>�
>>�
>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認為
>�
>>S
>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,�
>L
>>�
>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>
>>佢很串,常單打學生,玩針對,我是佢個班就知,一做錯事就以後
>�
>>鯓\針對
>
>佢而家教我英文...成日要我地做news assignment.好慘啊


邊個關xx? who
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Maggie Lee是最有問題的老師


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:48:33 12/20/09 Sun

>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式 等等
>>>>>>
>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>
>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>
>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩飛
>"
>>�
>>>�
>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認�
>�
>>�
>>>S
>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數,
>�
>>L
>>>�
>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>
>>>佢很串,常單打學生,玩針對,我是佢個班就知,一做錯事就以�
>�
>>�
>>>鯓\針對
>>
>>佢而家教我英文...成日要我地做news assignment.好慘啊
>
>
>邊個關xx? who

多年前已退休, 出名教書有大問題.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 李秀容是最有問題的老師


Author:
英國Billy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:28:56 10/03/09 Sat

我覺得Maggie Li教得好好。
記得中四開頭係佢教,全班人都好靜聽佢話。但後來Miss Li請產假,轉左Mr Ng教。佢都教得好好,但換來的就是上課嘈吵。


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.