VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6] ]
Subject: I see your point


Author:
Jim O.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:44:28 07/14/02 Sun
In reply to: Bearhawke in Az 's message, "1977-78 Fury/Monaco question" on 08:26:47 07/12/02 Fri

I read your post for the second time and realized I had
missed key parts of it. I stand corrected - except for the
fuel guzzling remark!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
I think most likely it was the lean burn system and cylinder head warping.ford jockey but prefer Mopar13:37:31 07/15/02 Mon

    Novas, now that's an improvement, I especially liked the way they all had the rear ends that slipped on the mounts and remained at an angle so when they drove down the road they were crooked, it kind of reminded me of a clown car in a circus parade. (NT)I'll stick with the Mopar...anyday.17:46:30 07/16/02 Tue



    Forum timezone: GMT-6
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.