Author:
Dana
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 00:26:56 04/23/25 Wed
"I remember years ago (maybe 2008) a spokeswoman from the NSPCC (British charity charged with protecting children, who are rabidly anti smacking) conceded in the interview that 9 out 10 teens who had experienced both would choose spanking over grounding.
She replied 'That's because grounding is even more cruel,' and we were too busy laughing to hear the rest."
Maybe if the spanking is light, a teen would choose it over grounding. There is also the embarrassment factor. This must vary from kid to kid, but if the spanking is truly feared, and causes a deep sense of shame, then a grounding can be a huge relief. A spanking in our house caused both fear and shame, and I doubt many teens would choose that punishment. Of course, nothing said you couldn't have both. The punishment could be a grounding with a blistered behind.
Whatever the case, a parent can ultimately cause more damage than good. They're not just reminding the child to be careful around the house, they could also be teaching about unfairness, lack of compassion and forgiveness, addressing problems through violence, and that material things are more important than human beings.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|