VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:54:33 04/12/01 Thu
Author: Remington
Subject: Mike you still don't get it
In reply to: Mike 's message, "Gee...how many have you seen?" on 21:26:06 04/12/01 Thu

Mike: You still don't get it. Moe's swing is completely integrated. The downswing is no more, or, less important, than the backswing. Each is just a moment in time. The essence of Moe's swing is to understand the integration. You must understand that you will successfully exeucte a particular motion, if you successfully complete the motion preceding it. THE SWING IS PERFECT. If you change the swing, like taking the backswing back on plane, you eliminate the integration factor; you lose the perfection; you are no longer assured of success. If this seems to help you in reading my posts: THIS IS FACT.

You see Mike, you give off all of the "puller markers". You want to swing back on plane, lift the club over your head, and pull the shaft down, attempting to hold the back of your left hand forward for as long as possible to maintain the angle. That ain't what Moe is doing. That's fact. What you are doing, and what all "on plane" single axis players do, is to swing like you used to swing (CG)with an SA grip.

Mike: More facts.







>>What you say is true. However, it does not negate
>>that what I say is untrue. I was only talking about
>>the backswing, and where most of the problems lie for
>>the average student of NG.
>
>
>How many average NG students have you seen?
>
>Just wondering how you came to your conclusion that
>you state as fact.
>
>I have never seen anybody hit the ball with their
>backswing, but what separates the tour players from
>the hacks is the amount of angle retained between the
>shaft of the club and left arm prior to impact. The
>pros and Moe retain the angle much longer in the
>downswing then the everyday hacker, regardless of CG
>or NG. The problem is the downswing not the backswing!
>
>I believe that the only flaw in Moe's swing is his
>backswing going under the plane starting out, but it
>works for him because he pulls so hard with his left
>side and arm that he gets the club back on plane and
>retains the angle until just before impact. For a
>right hand dominant person to correct this way is
>almost impossible in my experience.
>
>When you make a post, please post that it is your
>opinion and not a fact.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.