Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ] |
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Football......a little off topic -- NUGrad, 21:09:16 06/20/03 Fri
Bainsey...I'm not taking anything personally or reacting emotionally. When you note that Maine has been picked #1 and go on to say that (your words) "UVM should give Maine a strong run" that tells me that you agree that Maine should be the top pick...but that UVM might challange. How could this be any clearer? What is interesting to me is when NU gets a top pick your reaction is "polls are worthless"....an observation that doesn't appear anywhere in the Maine thread. What we can both agree with is that this has been beaten to death. I'm done.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Football......a little off topic -- Bainsey, 23:35:12 06/21/03 Sat
>Bainsey...I'm not taking anything personally or reacting emotionally.
Really? Then why say...
>What is interesting to me is when NU gets a top pick your
>reaction is "polls are worthless"....
For the record, I would say that regardless of who was picked at the top. If I am inferring incorrectly that you're reacting defensively as an NU alum, then I apologize. However, here's my beef:
>When you note that Maine has been picked #1 and go on to
>say that (your words) "UVM should give Maine a strong run"...
Yes, I said that and meant it. So far, so good.
>that tells me that you agree that Maine should be the top pick...
BINGO! THAT'S where you misquote me, my Husky friend. Nowhere in there did I say that Maine -- or anyone else -- SHOULD be number one. I said that Maine and Vermont would battle, but I said nothing as to the result. The reason? You cannot predict the results.
For what I hope is the last time, I said that I CAN SEE WHY the pollsters picked Maine: because it is the defending champion and it returned many players. As one who has worked in sports journalism, I understand the mentality of pollsters, which is really not that difficult to understand. Just because I understand the thinking does NOT mean I necessarily agree with it. THAT is what I am saying.
>What we can both agree with is that this has been beaten to death.
Perhaps, but when my integrity is questioned, I cannot let that go without setting the record straight. I'm done, too, if you are.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Football......a little off topic -- NUGrad, 00:01:03 06/23/03 Mon
Apology accepted.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Football......a little off topic -- Van Lier, 12:01:19 06/23/03 Mon
I'm thinking the term "sports journalism" has been an oxymoron for at least 10, 15 years now.
Now don't go reading anything into that.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]