Author:
Rob
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 10:55:55 03/26/26 Thu
Author Host/IP: 188.172.75.174
I suppose only one argument here is valid, which is also supported by health experts, which is that the skin in every parts of the body needs breathing and is beneficial for optimal health.
Which is why sports in ancient times up to not so long ago was always done naked or with very limited clothing.
It is only when modesty began to be taken into consideration that some clothing was allowed in public, but this only applied to adults since children do not offend anyone by being naked.
Also by nature children do not have a natural sense of modesty, it is only imposed on them from a young age.
The question is why are girls always afforded modesty while many consider it is not so important for boys as you show in your examples here. The answer is that nude girls are seen as sexual objects while nude boys are not seen as sexual objects by girls and women, even though they may admire their beauty as Jermaine Greer and other feminists point out in their writings about the beauty of naked boys up to a certain age.
While the sight of a naked man offends many, if not most women, the sight of a naked boy up to maybe early teens does not offend them.
This may be arguable but is the general opinion, which is why boys were displayed naked in front of girls and women, but not girls in front of boys or men.
>In 2024, Mik wrote to the 206801 forum in present
>tense. He was kept nude at home, and probably still
>is. He was made to receive playdates, visit his
>cousins, and attend sleepovers completely bare. At one
>time, he was made to perform nude yoga postures for
>his mother’s women’s yoga club.
>
>The parents of 13-year-old Jeremy (2015, Voy 143459)
>and his 14-year-old brother were somewhat more
>lenient. When the parents had guests, the boys were
>either allowed to wear clothes or sent to their room.
>When the boys went out of the house, they were allowed
>to wear swimsuits.
>
>Unlike Mik’s parents, however, Jeremy’s parents
>expected immodesty from any boy visiting the home. He
>was allowed to wear a swimsuit or undergarment,
>however.
>
>What is the case in favor of keeping a boy naked at
>home? Here are a few gleanings:
>
>----In the words of Mik’s mother, boys "don't need
>modesty" and "have nothing to hide."
>
>----Mik’s mother asked, “Everyone's seen a willy
>and butt cheeks before, so what's so special about
>yours?”
>
>----Mik’s nudity was conducive to body awareness and
>body confidence.
>
>----Mik’s nudity was a preventive against
>overeating, alcoholism, and couch potato-hood.
>
>----Mik’s nudity was an effective health safeguard.
>If Mik’s mother’s brother were kept naked, his
>case of testicular cancer could have been detected
>earlier.
>
>----The air on the skin, whether indoors or outdoors,
>is good for the body. Mik himself admitted that the
>fresh air felt good when he was outside shooting hoops.
>
>----According to Mik’s own admission, he was
>accustomed to being nude in the presence of his own
>family.
>
>----By the admission of Jeremy (2015, Voy 14359),
>“it’s a lot more comfortable during the summer.”
>
>----According to the parents of Jeremy (2015, Voy
>14359), the boys were “better behaved and can’t
>get up to much.” Their sister must have already
>behaved well, because the mandate did not apply to her.
>
>----We certainly must not neglect any girl’s
>educational needs. The summer that Pumba (2018, Voy
>223876) was 8 years old, he was kept naked 5 hours a
>day for the benefit of his 11-year-old sister Louise.
>
>What is the case AGAINST keeping a boy naked at home?
>Here is Mik’s case:
>
>---Mik could not become accustomed to being nude in
>the presence of his friends, his cousins, and his
>house guests.
>
>----Mik’s house guests, although well-meaning,
>discussed his nudity in a way that made him feel like
>“a science experiment or something.”
>
>----Mik’s friends’ sisters were not always very
>courteous. He did not like their grabbing his penis.
>
>In all of the foregoing examples, the families
>discriminated on the basis of age and gender. The
>family in which Ken (2020, Voy 223876) grew up,
>however, discriminated only on the basis of gender. A
>sign at the front entrance read that “any males
>present would be naked and in full view of anyone who
>entered.”
>
>Ken’s mother had a book club. Some of the women
>brought their daughters. Ken commented, “I guess
>they wanted them to enjoy the view and I did not mind
>giving them that view.”
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|
Feedback: 