[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:15
Author: ketch-8Apr02
Subject: Re: The Christ Child
In reply to: Dwayanu-8Apr02 's message, "Re: The Christ Child" on 12:14

At first you tried to claim that Paulsen did not write of the birth of a human baby. Now you seem to be admitting that Paulsen did write about a human baby, but realised later that something else was meant. Since you claim that Paulsen had realised this by the time he wrote "Sunburst", it should be an easy matter for you to show us where in "Sunburst" Paulsen explains that a human birth was not what was meant. If no such explanation exists then Paulsen was writing something he knew to be untrue (though anyone who was not completely brain dead would realise that most of the book is like that). If you cannot show us where Paulsen explains that no human birth is involved then you are, in effect, admitting Paulsen was lying in "Sunburst".

Just as the child born on New Year's Eve which Paulsen writes about has failed to turn up, so also the invasion by extra terrestrials which Paulsen claimed was imminent has also failed to materialise. What is your explanation for this? Did Paulsen really mean something else here as well?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.