Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:50:33 10/30/11 Sun
Author: john
Subject: Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" on 09:49:24 10/29/11 Sat

ROFLOL!

this personal attack on the leaders is really very unbecoming, George and truly quite telling!

if you are going to make allegations of this sort you had best have some proof...

john

>>Lois!
>>
>>you have already told us that you didn't get along
>>with people in your congregation and imagined that
>>they were happy you left!
>>
>>perhaps it is time to sit back, have a good look and
>>see if it is really "everyone else" that has the
>>problem...
>>
>>and strange that you should accuse the "leaders" of
>>being dishonest when you, yourself, seem to like
>>always to play "fast and loose" with the truth!
>>
>>Pot. Kettle. Black.
>>
>>john
>>
>
>Now you're making me laugh, John.
>
>If Lois went back to her previous congregation to see
>what was up, she probably would not recognize anybody
>there. If I went back to my old congregation, I
>wouldn't actually even find anybody there. Remember,
>mine just dwindled in unbelief to the point that it
>had to be merged with another dwindling congregation
>to maintain the fiction that the First Presidency is
>boldly leading into the future.
>
>That's why my old congregation has folded. Everyone
>else at my old congregation hated what the leadership
>was doing to the church so badly that they simply
>left. I didn't have to tell them anything. It just
>sucked so badly that they just left. They weren't
>excommunicted or locked out. The First Presidency
>doesn't have to do that any more, because it is so
>good at alienating everyone by its postChristian
>obsessions.
>
>My congregation didn't leave to get away from my
>"bitterness and anger." I was the one who left them
>alone. I wasn't out front handing out pamphlets from
>Price Publishing, or calling people from the directory
>and giving them a bad time. I left them alone with the
>consequences of tyrannical "administrative decisions"
>by the First Presidency and the Twelve Apostates, may
>their paychecks be blessed. And left to their own
>devices, my congregation did what I did. They left.
>
>You can call that nonsense, but if you'll go to my
>congregation on Sunday morning and look around, you
>see the real nonsense is what you see through your
>rose colored glasses. And the only pot is what is
>still sequestered in the cell membranes in the brains
>of the hierarchy who were smoking it in college. You
>know, someone who smokes MJ a lot ends up with brain
>cells that look black on photos from the electon
>microscope. That is because of the tremendous quantity
>of tetrahydrocannabinol still stuck in inclusion
>bodies in the cell membranes that it literally blocks
>the light.
>
>And that is why, despite their huge intellects and
>expensive educations, the leaders of the Community of
>Christ cannot see. When they think they hear Jesus,
>its the THC talking.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly -- George, 10:21:47 10/30/11 Sun