Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont. -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:28:24 07/16/11 Sat
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont.
In reply to: Lois 's message, "c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont." on 15:08:36 07/01/11 Fri

I want it NOW!!!!!

The Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgendered crowd (it is not possible to be lovingly monogamous in a bisexual state) does not understand that the leadership of the community-not-of-Christ truly does have their interests at heart. They are doing their very, very best to get the homosexual agenda in place as quickly as possible. But they also want to make it look like it was a democratic and spiritually discerning process. Of course it will not be. Just remember how they got women in the priesthood, the name change, membership in the National Council of Churches, etc. Those were not democratic, spiritually discerning decisions. They were brought about by deception and the iron fist.

Following are excerpts. The first is from Gay and Lesbian Acceptance (GALA, which is allowed to use church logos, etc.). The second is from a presumably homosexual who is watching the c-not-of-c and has figured out their strategy.

I wonder if this has anything to do with the early retirement of James Slauter?
-------

http://galaweb.org/Newsletters/2011/June2011.pdf

The GALA Newsletter, June 2011, Volume 22 Issue 2

Comment by David Howard

ANOTHER EIGHT MONTHS??? How long do they expect us to wait to be treated like everyone else? How long will the church deny our offering of our gifts in ministry? What is behind this delay? Can they still not be trusted? Who is behind this delay? Why do I expend my time, energy and resources when it may all be for naught? Do they not understand the pain? I am through! I don�t want to be second class any longer. I want to worship in peace.

http://mormonmatters.org/2010/04/21/after-action-report-the-community-of-christ-did-what/

The greatest sign of movement toward gay rights comes from something in administrative minutia. It is normal for the church to realign Apostolic Fields following a World Conference (our Apostles retire, so there are usually changes in the Twelve). This time a gerrymandered field has been carved out for Apostle Susan Skoor that stretches from Southern Australia to Eastern Canada � and just happens to cover all of the non-US jurisdictions that proposed World Conference legislation expanding full priesthood and sacramental rites for gays. The extension of rights in that Field or in nations within that Field might be granted while maintaining sufficient distance from the World Church (and prying media) to protect the church in cultures hostile to gay rights.
---------

Submitted by Lois

http://galaweb.org/Newsletters/2004/winter04.pdf

The GALA Newsletter
Winter 2004-2005 – Volume 15 Issue 3

When a dialogue session was brought up in the 2002-2003 school year, the GSA also played a pivotal role removing the anti-homosexual hate speeches of Dr. Paul Cameron off the university campus. Dr. Cameron was brought to campus to give his view on homosexuality. When it was discovered his speech lacked scientific research and teetered on the edge of hate speech, the administration, through a push from concerned faculty members, students and GSA members, removed him from campus. The dialogue was set up to provide under-standing from both viewpoints on homosexuality, not to provoke hate. The GSA also participated in a silent protest of Dr. Cameron's speech, which was moved to the Lamoni Community Center.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont. -- George, 15:01:01 07/16/11 Sat