Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont. -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:01:01 07/16/11 Sat
Author: George
Subject: Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont.
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont." on 12:28:24 07/16/11 Sat

>I want it NOW!!!!!
>
>The Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgendered crowd (it is
>not possible to be lovingly monogamous in a bisexual
>state) does not understand that the leadership of the
>community-not-of-Christ truly does have their
>interests at heart. They are doing their very, very
>best to get the homosexual agenda in place as quickly
>as possible. But they also want to make it look like
>it was a democratic and spiritually discerning
>process. Of course it will not be. Just remember how
>they got women in the priesthood, the name change,
>membership in the National Council of Churches, etc.
>Those were not democratic, spiritually discerning
>decisions. They were brought about by deception and
>the iron fist.
>
>Following are excerpts. The first is from Gay and
>Lesbian Acceptance (GALA, which is allowed to use
>church logos, etc.). The second is from a presumably
>homosexual who is watching the c-not-of-c and has
>figured out their strategy.
>
>I wonder if this has anything to do with the early
>retirement of James Slauter?
>-------
>
>The GALA Newsletter, June 2011, Volume 22 Issue 2
>
>Comment by David Howard
>
>ANOTHER EIGHT MONTHS??? How long do they expect us to
>wait to be treated like everyone else? How long will
>the church deny our offering of our gifts in ministry?
>What is behind this delay? Can they still not be
>trusted? Who is behind this delay? Why do I expend my
>time, energy and resources when it may all be for
>naught? Do they not understand the pain? I am through!
>I don�t want to be second class any longer. I want to
>worship in peace.
>
>
>The greatest sign of movement toward gay rights comes
>from something in administrative minutia. It is
>normal for the church to realign Apostolic Fields
>following a World Conference (our Apostles retire, so
>there are usually changes in the Twelve). This time
>a gerrymandered field has been carved out for Apostle
>Susan Skoor that stretches from Southern Australia to
>Eastern Canada � and just happens to cover all of the
>non-US jurisdictions that proposed World Conference
>legislation expanding full priesthood and sacramental
>rites for gays. The extension of rights in that
>Field or in nations within that Field might be granted
>while maintaining sufficient distance from the World
>Church (and prying media) to protect the church in
>cultures hostile to gay rights.
>---------
>
>Submitted by Lois
>
> >href="http://galaweb.org/Newsletters/2004/winter04.pdf"
>>http://galaweb.org/Newsletters/2004/winter04.pdf
>>The GALA Newsletter
>Winter 2004-2005 – Volume 15 Issue 3
>
>When a dialogue session was brought up in the
>2002-2003 school year, the GSA also played a pivotal
>role removing the anti-homosexual hate speeches of Dr.
>Paul Cameron off the university campus. Dr. Cameron
>was brought to campus to give his view on
>homosexuality. When it was discovered his speech
>lacked scientific research and teetered on the edge of
>hate speech, the administration, through a push from
>concerned faculty members, students and GSA members,
>removed him from campus. The dialogue was set up to
>provide under-standing from both viewpoints on
>homosexuality, not to provoke hate. The GSA also
>participated in a silent protest of Dr. Cameron's
>speech, which was moved to the Lamoni Community
>Center.
>

Lois, it occurred to me that homosexuals could have their own country and government if they colonized Mars. That sounded absurd enough, but it was worse than I thought. How does one have a country that is exclusively homosexual?

Just as the wealth of the Roman estate was dependent upon the presence of its slaves, the continuing existence and welfare of homosexuals is dependent upon, of all things, heterosexuals! The disgust that homosexuals show for things "not moving fast enough" is the same contempt that a child has for his parents when they tell him that age 12 is not old enough to learn how to drive, or that age 16 is not old enough to have sex.

Where destruction is in the offing lies in the fact that those in our advanced society who are able to live and survive without doing much that is constructive are determined to destroy everyone and everything that is constructive -- out of childish petulance.

As I have mused before -- when the activists, from phony civil rights activists, to illegal alien activists, to gay rights activists manage to wreck the entire culture, financial system, and government, we will end up back in the Middle Ages. We have to have stable families, stable, reasonably homogenous and integrated population, and democratic rule -- not mobocracy - in order to keep an advanced society functioning.

The Middle Ages was a difficult time. Survival was hard, and anything that worked against survival -- like homosexuality, out of wedlock births, paper money, and consumer loans -- was not looked well upon. Actually, those things are not looked upon well at the moment, either. During the Middle Ages those things were vigorously persecuted. Going back to such an environment will at least give these folks a taste of what intolerance actually is, as opposed to their fantasy that merely being tolerated is intolerable. The irony is that their activities will directly result in the kind of world that Islamic fundamentalists long for -- one in which homosexuals get summarily executed.

The attitude of our modern activists is similar to that of the Jewish establishment in 70 AD. They chafed under foreign rule -- even though it provided a stable economy and government, as well as safety from domestic terrorism and foreign raiders -- and decided that total destruction of everything and everybody was better than not having their own way.

I have started to believe that nihilism, rather than socialism, is the actual driving philosophy behind these nut cases.

I seriously doubt they can wreck the place as fast as I fear they might. But what are future generations going to have to live with after these people get through piloting the liner into an iceberg?

George

Note to David Howard: Homosexuals and GALA are not treated "like everyone else." Nonhomosexuals and/or nonhomosexual activists are barred from the Community of Christ priesthood, says Steve Veazey. Those who are in opposition to standing church law on female ordination are not treated like those in opposition to standing church law on homsexual ordination.

Those opposed to female ordination were ejected from the churches, defrocked, and excommunicated. What happened to those who performed homosexual ordinations and shacking up cermonies (for any orientation?) Answer: Absolutely NOTHING!

It is a screaming idiotic introverted mess when the elite claim that they are the ones being persecuted. Like all those put upon Germans in the Sudetenland back in 1938.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]