HTML content option:
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:10:10 11/18/02 Mon
Author: Jonathan Womack
Subject: Re: Well, since its started I will post my 2 cents. First off, THIS IS NOT PERSONAL, just has to do with car. It is true that the car can carry legal weight and is for the most part same as everybody else, however the roadster has less frontal area, thus the drag coefficient is less. I know this is probably minimal, but it is one more piece to the overall equation of fast. Also, I believe delay boxes are an advantage ( only for those who have a car that will go red).
In reply to: Jeff Owen 's message, "Well, since its started I will post my 2 cents. First off, THIS IS NOT PERSONAL, just has to do with car. It is true that the car can carry legal weight and is for the most part same as everybody else, however the roadster has less frontal area, thus the drag coefficient is less. I know this is probably minimal, but it is one more piece to the overall equation of fast. Also, I believe delay boxes are an advantage ( only for those who have a car that will go red)." on 06:14:44 11/18/02 Mon

Sorry, but your're wrong dude. Our car is not a narrowed version of the vette. It is the exact same size and width of a stock corvette. We have no aerodynamic advantages over any of the newer cars ou there. Corvettes are very wide. In fact, the roll cage hanging in the wind is very poor aerodynamically. It is not the 5/8 scale you often see in the dragster!! I have no advantages over anyone else.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Jonathon, nobody is saying your car is not a full size corvette. Wha we are saying is you are not pushing a windshield and roof through the traps. I dont mind if you run with us but I do think the roadster body should carry some kind of weight penalty. As far as the 27's go just put a year cap on it like 49 and later body styles only. -- jeff benham, 12:32:42 11/18/02 Mon [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.