HTML content option:
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:51:18 10/09/02 Wed
Author: Mark
Subject: Thanks! Jeff warned me that this was going to be a bitch and he was right. I must admit that I've enjoyed the challenge and I've met a lot of good people in the process. Hey, who knows about how big this thing can get. We might have to tell Wally and that NHRA bunch to get out of the way. As far as next year, who knows. If we have good participation and we're able to round up the sponsors, I think the skies the limit. When you think about it, Mike and I sat down and whipped this deal up less than 60 days ago. Whodathunkit?
In reply to: Scott Dodson 's message, "Meeting" on 10:28:40 10/09/02 Wed

>Are you planning on having another meeting prior to
>the 2003 season to discuss the pros and cons of the
>first two races?
>
>This may be a dumb question, but have you thought
>about having representatives in different regions in
>Texas to handle proposed rule amendments? (Dallas,
>Houston, San Antonio, Beaumont and Victoria). These
>reps would be able to refine a rules proposal and put
>it into the proper technical terms. Those proposals
>would then be sent to you to be voted on by the
>Organization or an elected committee?
>
>It appears to me that you have an awful lot of
>intelligent individuals wanting to run with The Texas
>Pro Stock Organization. I would think that everyone
>would like more cars to ensue a larger payout,
>provided all of the cars are on an equal playing field.
>
>I would assume that John would be against this,
>because with more rules and different combinations,
>means more work to keep everyone in-line for the "Tech
>Guy".
>
>I want to also commend you and everyone else involved
>in this Organization for all of the hard work involved
>in trying to make this thing succeed. Running this
>Organization is the same as tweaking on your car to
>make it run faster, a lot of time and effort and you
>will usually succeed.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: Meeting Scott, thanks for your input, these are some good points & ideas. I'm not oposed to having another meeting after this next race and before the year end to discuss things before we implement the final rules for next year. Again thanks for your constructive opinions and input, we'll be in touch. If you would like to discuss your thoughts further , e-mail or call me direct , my info is on the contact page. -- Michael Morgan/TPSA, 15:04:21 10/09/02 Wed [1]

>Are you planning on having another meeting prior to
>the 2003 season to discuss the pros and cons of the
>first two races?
>
>This may be a dumb question, but have you thought
>about having representatives in different regions in
>Texas to handle proposed rule amendments? (Dallas,
>Houston, San Antonio, Beaumont and Victoria). These
>reps would be able to refine a rules proposal and put
>it into the proper technical terms. Those proposals
>would then be sent to you to be voted on by the
>Organization or an elected committee?
>
>It appears to me that you have an awful lot of
>intelligent individuals wanting to run with The Texas
>Pro Stock Organization. I would think that everyone
>would like more cars to ensue a larger payout,
>provided all of the cars are on an equal playing field.
>
>I would assume that John would be against this,
>because with more rules and different combinations,
>means more work to keep everyone in-line for the "Tech
>Guy".
>
>I want to also commend you and everyone else involved
>in this Organization for all of the hard work involved
>in trying to make this thing succeed. Running this
>Organization is the same as tweaking on your car to
>make it run faster, a lot of time and effort and you
>will usually succeed.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.