VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]
Subject: Re: 再剌大家思考﹗


Author:
毛毛查
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05:06:43 07/13/01 Fri
In reply to: 但我也嘗試答你 's message, "據說有另一個人會答你" on 02:57:01 07/13/01 Fri

>夏宇《摩擦.無以名狀》是一個很好的「拼湊範例」。夏宇曾?>g希望文字能夠擺脫意義而終於不可能。

1. 「意義」是甚麼?
2. 為甚麼不能抹煞詩與民間的界限?我們的優劣之分,所謂的個人取向,是不表明一切理論的個人化?
3. 答夏宇﹕這是可能的,不過這已是尼采「超人」的境界。而IT意義爆炸的鏡象就是無意義的黑洞。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
為什麼要擺脫意義呢?背後有沒有什麼理念呢?09:49:46 07/14/01 Sat
    Re: 為什麼要擺脫意義呢?試答10:20:15 07/14/01 Sat


    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.