VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]
Subject: 細袁教PHYSICS太過偏重數學了


Author:
form 6c student
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:49:06 12/15/01 Sat
In reply to: 學生 's message, "細苑收皮!" on 09:22:28 12/13/01 Thu
 細袁教PHYSICS真是太偏重數學了.
我不否定數學在PHYSICS的重要性,但是,講物理是不是一定要靠數學呢?
搞到我每晚發夢時,滿腦子都是EQUATION.好辛苦啊.
愛恩斯坦曾經說過:物理的書充滿了複雜的數學公式.可是思想及理念,而非公式,才是每一端物理的開端.
所以,我希望細袁SIR能減少用MATHS去講解物理吧.
另外,希望細袁SIR能講少Ｄ OUT OF SYLLABUS 的O野,我這樣說,不是反對袁SIR教新奇的東西,而是因為某些學生學IN OF SYLLABUS的O野都未學都好,學OUT IF SYLLABUS 的東西,只會加重學生的負擔,都後來,什麼也學不好.搞到一團糟,死多二錢重.
就以上個星期交的功課ROTATIONAL MOTION為例,有幾多個同學是有能力獨自做好所有MATHS而不用抄別人的?因此,我認為這証明同學是不太適合用MATHS的方法去學PHYSIC的.
袁SIR,我認為現在是時候作出改變了吧?
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 細袁教PHYSICS太過偏重數學了6B boy17:17:48 12/15/01 Sat
Re: 細袁教PHYSICS太過偏重數學了6C同學06:37:31 12/17/01 Mon

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.