VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:43:47 06/15/00 Thu
Author: Peter
Subject: Re: Hook and make successful
In reply to: Remington 's message, "Hook and make successful" on 12:49:06 06/15/00 Thu

One quetion is how do you make the student successful. When I compare the swings of the amateurs vs. the pros in the NG infomercial it does not seem to me that they made these players successful.

I am not judging by the student's comments (clearly they said great things about NG) but by the swing deltas. In my experience in other sports amateurs 'look' a lot more like pros though they clearly get different results.

I have suggested in the NG DG that using the Compusport teaching technique applied against a Moe/Todd as the swing model is IMHO the BEST way to get a lot of golfers swinging like Moe/Todd. I think that if they came as close to the look as I think is possible they would be successful though not with the same distance and contact consistency that can only come from practice.

I can't imagine that this would be a hard thing to do. The pro that lead my lesson said he would never go back to teaching without the technology. That is was clearly a differentiator. The VISIBLE improvement in 45 minutes for both me and my wife (who hits balls maybe once every 3-9 months and was last on a course in '98) was amazing.

Peter

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: Questions for Remington -- Max, 20:15:32 06/15/00 Thu
  • Re: Questions for Remington -- Don, 20:40:05 06/15/00 Thu
  • Are you Satan? -- Remington, 23:01:33 06/15/00 Thu
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-6
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.